Affiliation:
1. Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, Leiden, The Netherlands
2. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
3. Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Educational Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Globally, mitigation measures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have focused on protecting older adults. Earlier disaster studies have shown the importance of including older peoples’ voices to prevent secondary stressors, yet these voices have received little attention during this pandemic. Here, we explore how Dutch older adults view this crisis and cope with measures to contribute to our understanding of coping of older adults in general and during disaster situations more specifically.
Method
Qualitative study using semistructured telephone interviews with 59 diverse older adults aged 54–95 throughout the Netherlands.
Results
Older adults typify this crisis as ungraspable, disrupting their daily and social lives. Despite filling their lives with activities, they experience loss or lack of purpose. They try to follow measures to decrease infection risk and gain control, and use problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies. Emotion-focused strategies used were interpreting their personal vulnerability, self-enhancing comparisons, acceptance, and distraction. In the latter 2 strategies, the temporary nature of measures was emphasized.
Discussion
Older adults describe this crisis consistently with earlier findings from disaster studies. They use known coping strategies, but emphasize the duration in relation to their expectation of temporality. This underscores a dynamic, processual approach toward coping that incorporates temporal dimensions such as duration and order. Our findings stress the importance of acknowledging heterogeneity among older adults and adjusting communication about mitigation measures to decrease insecurity and increase resonance. This may make COVID-19 mitigation measures more manageable and age-responsible and allow older adults to start living again.
Funder
Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference57 articles.
1. Aging disaster: Mortality, vulnerability, and long-term recovery among Katrina survivors;Adams;Medical Anthropology,2011
2. The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds;Albrecht;Social Science & Medicine (1982),1999
3. COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly;Armitage;The Lancet Public Health,2020
4. Aging in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Avoiding ageism and fostering intergenerational solidarity;Ayalon;The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,2020
5. The impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 transmission on contacts and mixing patterns in the Netherlands: Repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2016/2017, April 2020 and June 2020;Backer;medRxiv,2020
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献