The Efficacy of Different Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain and Sequelae in Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis

Author:

Seretis KonstantinosORCID,Bounas Nikolaos

Abstract

Abstract Background Although abdominoplasty is growing in popularity, it still results in considerable postoperative pain, which prolongs recovery. Objectives The aim of this network meta-analysis was to combine evidence about different regional nerve blocks to examine their effectiveness in the management of postoperative pain sequelae and recovery following abdominoplasty. Methods An electronic literature search in the MEDLINE (PubMed; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Cochrane Library (London, UK) and US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register electronic databases (Bethesda, MD) was conducted from inception to July 2022. Inclusion criteria were the presence of intervention and control groups; data derived from controlled studies evaluating nerve blocks after abdominoplasty, in terms of analgesia needs, complications, and patient satisfaction; and publication in peer-reviewed journals. The quality of studies was assessed via Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted for all outcomes of interest. Results A total of 12 studies, containing 543 patients with no differences in age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities, met the inclusion criteria. Transversus abdominis plane blocks have been found to reduce 24-hour and 48-hour opioid consumption (−3.70 and −5.01 weighted mean difference, respectively). In addition, the nerve blocks reviewed effectively prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia request, were safe in terms of complications, and were associated with high satisfaction rates. Conclusions Nerve blocks emerge as an effective and safe adjunct for adequate pain management following abdominoplasty. This meta-analysis provides an evidence-based strategy to optimize the current analgesia regimens following abdominoplasty. Level of Evidence: 3

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3