Comparative Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccines Among US Medicare Beneficiaries Ages 65 Years and Older During the 2019–2020 Season

Author:

Izurieta Hector S1,Lu Michael2,Kelman Jeffrey3,Lu Yun1,Lindaas Arnstein2,Loc Julie2,Pratt Douglas1,Wei Yuqin2,Chillarige Yoganand2,Wernecke Michael2,MaCurdy Thomas E24,Forshee Richard1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA

2. Acumen LLC, Burlingame, California, USA

3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Washington, DC, USA

4. Stanford University Department of Economics, Stanford, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Approximately 50 000 influenza-associated deaths occur annually in the United States, overwhelmingly among individuals aged ≥65 years. Although vaccination is the primary prevention tool, investigations have shown low vaccine effectiveness (VE) in recent years, particularly among the elderly. We analyzed the relative VE (RVE) of all influenza vaccines among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years to prevent influenza hospital encounters during the 2019–2020 season. Methods Retrospective cohort study using Poisson regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Exposures included egg-based high-dose trivalent (HD-IIV3), egg-based adjuvanted trivalent (aIIV3), egg-based standard dose (SD) quadrivalent (IIV4), cell-based SD quadrivalent (cIIV4), and recombinant quadrivalent (RIV4) influenza vaccines. Results We studied 12.7 million vaccinated beneficiaries. Following IPTW, cohorts were well balanced for all covariates and health-seeking behavior indicators. In the adjusted analysis, RIV4 (RVE, 13.3%; 95% CI, 7.4–18.9%), aIIV3 (RVE, 8.2%; 95% CI, 4.2–12.0%), and HD-IIV3 (RVE, 6.8%; 95% CI, 3.3–10.1%) were significantly more effective in preventing hospital encounters than the reference egg-based SD IIV4, while cIIV4 was not significantly more effective than IIV4 (RVE, 2.8%; 95% CI, −2.8%, 8.2%). Our results were consistent across all analyses. Conclusions In this influenza B-Victoria and A(H1N1)–dominated season, RIV4 was moderately more effective than other vaccines, while HD-IIV3 and aIIV3 were more effective than the IIV4 vaccines, highlighting the contributions of antigen amount and adjuvant use to VE. Egg adaptation likely did not substantially affect our RVE evaluation. Our findings, specific to the 2019–2020 season, should be evaluated in other studies using virological case confirmation.

Funder

Food and Drug Administration

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)

Reference40 articles.

1. Interim 2018/19 influenza vaccine effectiveness: six European studies, October 2018 to January 2019. Euro Surveill;Kissling,2019

2. Moving toward improved influenza vaccines;Monto;J Infect Dis,2017

3. Chasing seasonal influenza—the need for a universal influenza vaccine;Paules;N Engl J Med,2018

4. Effects of influenza vaccination in the United States during the 2017–2018 influenza season;Rolfes;Clin Infect Dis,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3