Affiliation:
1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine , St Louis, Missouri , USA
2. Division of Bone and Mineral Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine , St Louis, Missouri , USA
3. Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The dimorphic mycoses (DMs) of the United States—Histoplasma, Coccidioides, and Blastomyces—commonly known as endemic mycoses of North America (in addition to Paracoccidioides) are increasingly being diagnosed outside their historical areas of endemicity. Despite this trend, the maps outlining their geographic distributions have not been updated in more than half a century using a large, nationwide database containing individual-patient–level data.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of >45 million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 1 January 2007 through 31 December 2016. Diagnoses of histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, and blastomycosis were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/10th Revision, codes. The primary outcome was the incidence of histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, and blastomycosis for each US county. Clinically meaningful thresholds for incidence were defined as 100 cases/100 000 person-years for histoplasmosis and coccidioidomycosis and 50 cases/100 000 person-years for blastomycosis.
Results
There were 79 749 histoplasmosis, 37 726 coccidioidomycosis, and 6109 blastomycosis diagnoses in unique persons from 2007–2016 across 3143 US counties. Considering all US states plus Washington, DC, 94% (48/51) had ≥1 county above the clinically relevant threshold for histoplasmosis, 69% (35/51) for coccidioidomycosis, and 78% (40/51) for blastomycosis.
Conclusions
Persons with histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, and blastomycosis are diagnosed in significant numbers outside their historical geographic distributions established >50 years ago. Clinicians should consider DM diagnoses based on compatible clinical syndromes with less emphasis placed on patients' geographic exposure. Increased clinical suspicion leading to a subsequent increase in DM diagnostic testing would likely result in fewer missed diagnoses, fewer diagnostic delays, and improved patient outcomes.
Funder
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
National Institutes of Health/
Astellas ISR
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)
Reference24 articles.
1. Mycotic infections acquired outside areas of known endemicity, United States;Benedict;Emerg Infect Dis,2015
2. Some epidemiologic factors and diagnostic tests in blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis and histoplasmosis;Schwarz;Am J Clin Pathol,1955
3. An atlas of sensitivity to tuberculin, PPD-B, and histoplasmin in the United States;Edwards;Am Rev Respir Dis,1969
4. Re-drawing the maps for endemic mycoses;Ashraf;Mycopathologia,2020
5. Histoplasmosis infections worldwide: thinking outside of the Ohio River Valley;Bahr;Curr Trop Med Rep,2015
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献