What is the out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines in India? An empirical assessment using a novel methodology

Author:

Prinja Shankar1ORCID,Kumar Sumit1,Sharma Atul1,Kar Sitanshu Sekhar2ORCID,Tripathi Narayan3,Dumka Neha4,Sharma Sandeep4,Mukhopadhyay Indranil5,Rana Saroj Kumar1,Garg Samir3,Kotwal Atul4,Aggarwal Arun Kumar1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, PGIMER , Chandigarh 160012, India

2. Department of Community Medicine, JIPMER , Puducherry 605006, India

3. State Health Resource Centre , Raipur, Chhattisgarh 402001, India

4. National Health Systems Resource Centre, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare , New Delhi 110067, India

5. School of Government and Public Policy, OP Jindal Global University , Sonipat, Haryana 131001, India

Abstract

Abstract The share of expenditure on medicines as part of the total out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure on healthcare services has been reported to be much higher in India than in other countries. This study was conducted to ascertain the extent of this share of medicine expenditure using a novel methodology. OOP expenditure data were collected through exit interviews with 5252 out-patient department patients in three states of India. Follow-up interviews were conducted after Days 1 and 15 of the baseline to identify any additional expenditure incurred. In addition, medicine prescription data were collected from the patients through prescription audits. Self-reported expenditure on medicines was compared with the amount imputed using local market prices based on prescription data. The results were also compared with the mean expenditure on medicines per spell of ailment among non-hospitalized cases from the National Sample Survey (NSS) 75th round for the corresponding states and districts, which is based on household survey methodology. The share of medicines in OOP expenditure did not change significantly for organized private hospitals using the patient-reported vs imputation-based methods (30.74–29.61%). Large reductions were observed for single-doctor clinics, especially in the case of ‘Ayurvedic’ (64.51–36.51%) and homeopathic (57.53–42.74%) practitioners. After adjustment for socio-demographic factors and types of ailments, we found that household data collection as per NSS methodology leads to an increase of 25% and 26% in the reported share of medicines for public- and private-sector out-patient consultations respectively, as compared with facility-based exit interviews with the imputation of expenditure for medicines as per actual quantity and price data. The nature of healthcare transactions at single-doctor clinics in rural India leads to an over-reporting of expenditure on medicines by patients. While household surveys are valid to provide total expenditure, these are less likely to correctly estimate the share of medicine expenditure.

Funder

National Health Systems Resource Centre, Government of India

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3