Abstract
Out of pocket health payment (OOPs) has been identified by the System of Health Accounts (SHA) as the largest source of health care financing in most low and middle-income countries. This means that most low and middle-income countries will rely on user fees and co-payments to generate revenue, rationalize the use of services, contain health systems costs or improve health system efficiency and service quality. However, the accurate measurement of OOPs has been challenged by several limitations which are attributed to both sampling and non-sampling errors when OOPs are estimated from household surveys, the primary source of information in LICs and LMICs. The incorrect measurement of OOP health payments can undermine the credibility of current health spending estimates, an otherwise important indicator for tracking UHC, hence there is the need to address these limitations and improve the measurement of OOPs. In an attempt to improve the measurement of OOPs in surveys, the INDEPTH-Network Household out-of-pocket expenditure project (iHOPE) developed new modules on household health utilization and expenditure by repurposing the existing Ghana Living Standards Survey instrument and validating these new tools with a ‘gold standard’ (provider data) with the aim of proposing alternative approaches capable of producing reliable data for estimating OOPs in the context of National Health Accounts and for the purpose of monitoring financial protection in health. This paper reports on the challenges and opportunities in using and linking household reported out-of-pocket health expenditures to their corresponding provider records for the purpose of validating household reported out-of-pocket health expenditure in the iHOPE project.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
WHO
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference20 articles.
1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization, Statistical Office of the European Communities, editors. A system of health accounts 2011. 2011 ed. Paris: [Luxembourg]: [Geneva]: OECD ; Eurostat ; World Health Organization; 2011. 521 p.
2. Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study;A Wagstaff;Lancet Glob Health,2018
3. Progress on catastrophic health spending in 133 countries: a retrospective observational study;A Wagstaff;Lancet Glob Health,2018
4. WHO, The World Bank. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2017 Global Monitoring Report.
5. Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global Levels;T Boerma;PLOS Med,2014
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献