Risk governance in the response to global health emergencies: understanding the governance of chaos in Brazil’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic

Author:

Di Giulio Gabriela Marques123ORCID,Mendes Ione Maria3ORCID,Campos Felipe Dos Reis3ORCID,Nunes João23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Environmental Health Department, University of São Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil

2. Politics Department, University of York , York YO10 5DD, UK

3. Global Health and Sustainability Postgrad Program, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract The Covid-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has shown how inadequate institutional strategies interact with, and exacerbate, social inequalities, thus impacting upon the intensity of the harm produced and amplifying negative consequences. One of the lessons from this pandemic, which happens against the background of other, interconnected systemic crises, is the urgency of adopting a ‘whole-of-society’ approach to determining what does and what does not work in the context of a health emergency response. However, how can institutional performance in health emergency response be assessed? How to make sense of success or failure? We argue that the adoption of a risk governance approach sheds light on institutional performance in the response to health emergencies. Risk governance is particularly pertinent in situations where the potential for extreme consequences is considered high, where there are enormous uncertainties regarding the consequences and where different values are present and in dispute. Based on a documentary evidence review, we analyse the Brazilian response to Covid-19 by considering: (1) how the Brazilian federal government performed on its central role of managing the national response, (2) the reactions from other actors prompted by this performance and (3) the main observed effects emerging from this scenario. We argue that the Brazilian federal government response was weak in five risk governance parameters that are essential in a health crisis response: risk communication, transparency and accessibility of data, negotiation between actors, social cohesion and public participation and decisions based on technical and scientific evidence, resources and contexts. The neglect of risk governance parameters, combined with an attempt to spread doubt, confusion and disinformation—which could be termed a ‘governance by chaos’—is an important element for making sense of the effects and controversies surrounding Covid-19 in Brazil.

Funder

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference118 articles.

1. Comparative analysis of health policy implementation - The use of documentary analysis;Abott;Policy Studies,2004

2. Combate à COVID-19 sob o federalismo bolsonarista: um caso de descoordenação intergovernamental;Abrucio;Review Administration Public,2020

3. 10 campanhas para lembrar: ainda estamos na pandemia;Araújo,2021

4. Public Participation in Contaminated Communities;Ashford,1999

5. Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks;Aven;Journal of Risk Research,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3