Affiliation:
1. Environmental Health Department, University of São Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
2. Politics Department, University of York , York YO10 5DD, UK
3. Global Health and Sustainability Postgrad Program, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo , Sao Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract
The Covid-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has shown how inadequate institutional strategies interact with, and exacerbate, social inequalities, thus impacting upon the intensity of the harm produced and amplifying negative consequences. One of the lessons from this pandemic, which happens against the background of other, interconnected systemic crises, is the urgency of adopting a ‘whole-of-society’ approach to determining what does and what does not work in the context of a health emergency response. However, how can institutional performance in health emergency response be assessed? How to make sense of success or failure? We argue that the adoption of a risk governance approach sheds light on institutional performance in the response to health emergencies. Risk governance is particularly pertinent in situations where the potential for extreme consequences is considered high, where there are enormous uncertainties regarding the consequences and where different values are present and in dispute. Based on a documentary evidence review, we analyse the Brazilian response to Covid-19 by considering: (1) how the Brazilian federal government performed on its central role of managing the national response, (2) the reactions from other actors prompted by this performance and (3) the main observed effects emerging from this scenario. We argue that the Brazilian federal government response was weak in five risk governance parameters that are essential in a health crisis response: risk communication, transparency and accessibility of data, negotiation between actors, social cohesion and public participation and decisions based on technical and scientific evidence, resources and contexts. The neglect of risk governance parameters, combined with an attempt to spread doubt, confusion and disinformation—which could be termed a ‘governance by chaos’—is an important element for making sense of the effects and controversies surrounding Covid-19 in Brazil.
Funder
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference118 articles.
1. Comparative analysis of health policy implementation - The use of documentary analysis;Abott;Policy Studies,2004
2. Combate à COVID-19 sob o federalismo bolsonarista: um caso de descoordenação intergovernamental;Abrucio;Review Administration Public,2020
3. 10 campanhas para lembrar: ainda estamos na pandemia;Araújo,2021
4. Public Participation in Contaminated Communities;Ashford,1999
5. Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks;Aven;Journal of Risk Research,2019
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献