Affiliation:
1. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2 #10-01, Singapore 117549, Singapore
2. Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, UK
Abstract
Abstract
Empirical analysis of the connections between research and health policymaking is scarce in middle-income countries. In this study, we focused on a national multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) healthcare provider training programme in China as a case study to examine the role that research plays in influencing health policy. We specifically focused on the factors that influence research uptake within the complex Chinese policymaking process. Qualitative data were collected from 34 participants working at multilateral organizations, funding agencies, academia, government agencies and hospitals through 14 in-depth interviews and 2 focus group discussions with 10 participants each. Themes were derived inductively from data and grouped based on the ‘Research and Policy in Developing countries’ framework developed by the Overseas Development Institute. We further classified how actors derive their power to influence policy decisions following the six sources of power identified by Sriram et al. We found that research uptake by policymakers in China is influenced by perceived importance of the health issues addressed in the research, relevance of the research to policymakers’ information needs and government’s priorities, the research quality and the composition of the research team. Our analysis identified that international donors are influential in the TB policy process through their financial power. Furthermore, the dual roles of two government agencies as both evidence providers and actors who have the power to influence policy decisions through their technical expertise make them natural intermediaries in the TB policy process. We concluded that resolving the conflict of interests between researchers and policymakers, as suggested in the ‘two-communities theory’, is not enough to improve evidence use by policymakers. Strategies such as framing research to accommodate the fast-changing policy environment and making alliances with key policy actors can be effective to improve the communication of research findings into the policy process, particularly in countries undergoing rapid economic and political development.
Funder
United Way Worldwide
Singapore Population Health Improvement Centre
SPHERiC
Singapore National Medical Research Council
Lilly MDR-TB Partnership
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference65 articles.
1. Democratisation of scientific evidence;Bal;British Medical Journal,2004
2. What’s so special about policy networks?—An exploration of the concept and its usefulness in studying European governance;Börzel;European Integration Online Papers,1997
3. Pathways to “evidence-informed” policy and practice: a framework for action;Bowen;PLoS Medicine,2005
4. Getting research into policy—Herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) treatment and HIV infection: international guidelines formulation and the case of Ghana;Burris;Health Research Policy and Systems,2011
5. The two communities theory and knowledge utilization;Caplan;American Behavioral Scientist,1979
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献