Challenges for research uptake for health policymaking and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Author:

Semahegn Agumasie1ORCID,Manyazewal Tsagahun2,Hanlon Charlotte3,Getachew Eyerusalem2,Fekadu Bethelhem2,Assefa Esubalew2,Kassa Munir4,Hopkins Michael5,Woldehana Tasew6,Davey Gail7,Fekadu Abebaw2

Affiliation:

1. Haramaya University College of Health Sciences: Haramaya University College of Health and Medical Sciences

2. Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences

3. King's College London

4. Ethiopia Ministry of Health

5. University of Sussex

6. Addis Ababa University College of Management Information and Economic Services: Addis Ababa University College of Business and Economics

7. BSMS: Brighton and Sussex Medical School

Abstract

Abstract Background: An estimated 85% of research resources are wasted worldwide, while there is growing demand for context-based evidence-informed health policymaking. In low and middle-income countries (LMICs), research uptake for health policymaking and practice is low, while little is known about the barriers to the translation of health evidence to policy and local implementation. We conducted a scoping review to identify research uptake challenges for health policymaking and practice in LMICs. Methods: The scoping review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis-extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Both published and unpublished evidence on research uptake were systematically searched from major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL(EBSCO), Global Health (Ovid)) and direct Google Scholar. Literature exploring barriers to uptake of research evidence in health policy and practice in LMICs were included and their key findings were synthesized using thematic areas to address the review question. Results:A total of 4,291 literature were retrieved in the initial searches, of which 142 were included in the review as they met the eligibility criteria. The findings revealed low research uptake for policymaking and practice in LMICs. The challenges of research uptake were related to lack of understanding the local contexts, political priorities, poor stakeholder engagement and partnership, resource and capacity constraints, limited research infrastructure and institution support, low leadership commitment, lack of accountability and pathway, lack of communication and dissemination platforms. Conclusion: Multiple barriers exist in LMICs that hinder the translation of health research evidence into policy and practice. This calls for designing pragmatic strategies that facilitate an in-depth understanding of the local contexts, a conducive environment for researchers and policymakers to work closely with, and government ownership mitigating the barriers to low evidence uptake.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3