The process of prioritization of non-communicable diseases in the global health policy arena

Author:

Heller Olivia1,Somerville Claire2,Suggs L Suzanne3,Lachat Sarah1,Piper Julianne4,Aya Pastrana Nathaly3,Correia Jorge C1,Miranda J Jaime56ORCID,Beran David1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, Switzerland

2. Gender Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Ch. Eugène-Rigot 2, Geneva, Switzerland

3. BeCHANGE Research Group, Institute of Public Communication, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via G. Buffi 13, Lugano CH, Switzerland

4. Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Ch. Eugène-Rigot 2, Geneva, Switzerland

5. CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Av. Armendariz 445, Miraflores, Lima 18, Peru

6. School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Av. Armendariz 445, Miraflores, Lima 18, Peru

Abstract

Abstract Although non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, the global policy response has not been commensurate with their health, economic and social burden. This study examined factors facilitating and hampering the prioritization of NCDs on the United Nations (UN) health agenda. Shiffman and Smith’s (Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. The Lancet 370: 1370–9.) political priority framework served as a structure for analysis of a review of NCD policy documents identified through the World Health Organization’s (WHO) NCD Global Action Plan 2013–20, and complemented by 11 semi-structured interviews with key informants from different sectors. The results show that a cohesive policy community exists, and leaders are present, however, actor power does not extend beyond the health sector and the role of guiding institutions and civil society have only recently gained momentum. The framing of NCDs as four risk factors and four diseases does not necessarily resonate with experts from the larger policy community, but the economic argument seems to have enabled some traction to be gained. While many policy windows have occurred, their impact has been limited by the institutional constraints of the WHO. Credible indicators and effective interventions exist, but their applicability globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries, is questionable. To be effective, the NCD movement needs to expand beyond global health experts, foster civil society and develop a broader and more inclusive global governance structure. Applying the Shiffman and Smith framework for NCDs enabled different elements of how NCDs were able to get on the UN policy agenda to be disentangled. Much work has been done to frame the challenges and solutions, but implementation processes and their applicability remain challenging globally. NCD responses need to be adapted to local contexts, focus sufficiently on both prevention and management of disease, and have a stronger global governance structure.

Funder

COHESION

Swiss National Science Foundation

Swiss Development Cooperation

Swiss Program for Research on Global Issues for Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference67 articles.

1. UN high-level meeting on non-communicable diseases: addressing four questions;Beaglehole;The Lancet,2011

2. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis;Beaglehole;The Lancet,2011

3. The need to focus on primary health care for chronic diseases;Beran;The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology,2016

4. Pharmaceutical industry, non-communicable diseases and partnerships: more questions than answers;Beran;Journal of Global Health,2017

5. Pneumonia’s second wind? A case study of the global health network for childhood pneumonia;Berlan;Health Policy and Planning,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3