Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite a long history of political discourse around refugee integration, it wasn’t until 2016 that this issue emerged as a global political priority. Limited research has examined the evolution of policies of global actors around health service provision to refugees and how refugee integration into health systems came onto the global agenda. This study seeks to fill this gap.
Methods
Drawing on a document review of 20 peer-reviewed articles, 46 global policies and reports, and 18 semi-structured interviews with actors representing various bilateral, multilateral and non-governmental organizations involved with refugee health policy and funding, we analyze factors that have shaped the global policy priority of integration. We use the Shiffman and Smith Policy Framework on determinants of political priority to organize our findings.
Results
Several important factors generated global priority for refugee integration into national health systems. Employing the above-mentioned framework, actor power increased due to network expansion through collaborations between humanitarian and development actors. Ideas took hold through the framing of integration as a human rights and responsibility sharing. While political context was influenced through several global movements, it was ultimately the influx of Syrian refugees into Europe and the increasing securitization of the refugee crisis that led to key policies, and critically, global funding to support integration within refugee hosting nations. Finally, issue characteristics, namely the magnitude of the global refugee crisis, its protractedness and the increasing urbanicity of refugee inflows, led integration to emerge as a manageable solution.
Conclusion
The past decade has seen a substantial reframing of refugee integration, along with increased financing sources and increased collaboration, explains this shift towards their integration into health systems. However, despite the emergence of integration as a global political priority, the extent to which efforts around integration have translated into action at the national level remains uncertain.
Funder
UK Department of International Development (DFID), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Wellcome Trust
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Mid-Year UNHCR. Trends 2022 (Internet). cited May 6, 2023. https://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/635a578f4/mid-year-trends-2022.html#:~:text=UNHCR%27s%202022%20Mid%2DYear%20Trends,countries%20and%20countries%20of%20origin.
2. Aleinikoff TA. From Dependence to Self-Reliance: Changing the Paradigm in Protracted Refugee Situations. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute; 2015 05/ https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TCM-Protection-Aleinikoff.pdf.
3. Spiegel P, Sheik M, Gotway-Crawford C, Salama P. Health programmes and policies associated with decreased mortality in displaced people in postemergency phase camps: a retrospective study. Lancet (Internet). 2002;360(9349):1927–34.
4. Jackson S, The Evolution of World Bank Group’s Role in. Forced Displacement - Interview with Niels Harild, former manager of WBG’s Global Program on Forced Displacement (GPFD [Internet]. cited February 28, 2023. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2016/01/06/the-evolution-of-world-bank-group-role-in-forced-displacement.
5. OCHA. The Grand Bargain [Internet]. cited May 6, 2023. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/grand-bargain.