Perils of the Subjective Approach: A Critical Analysis of the UK National Crime Recording Standards

Author:

McFadzien Kent1,Phillips John M2

Affiliation:

1. Ph.D. candidate, and Visiting Scholar of the Jerry Lee Centre for Experimental Criminology, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, UK

2. MA(Cantab), Ph.D., Visiting Scholar of the Jerry Lee Centre for Experimental Criminology, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, UK

Abstract

Abstract It is now more than 15 years since the Home Office introduced a standardized methodology for crime recording in the UK. The April 2018 edition of the Home Office Crime Recording Standards sets out six purposes, which continue to inform the broad aim of the standards. These purposes include: the provision of a high-quality service to crime victims; promoting effective and ethical investigations; accurately informing the public about the risk of crime; and supporting police management and national policy development. These relatively lofty objectives might fairly be considered the success criteria against which the standards themselves can reasonably be judged. This article turns a critical eye to the performance of the existing regime against each objective in turn. In several key areas, it suggests that the crime recording standards have actually been counter-productive in application and now threaten both police efficiency and police legitimacy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law

Reference42 articles.

1. Shrinkage, Shoplifting and the Cost of Retail Crime in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Major Retailers in 16 European Countries;Bamfield;International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management,2004

2. An Observational Study of Shoplifting;Buckle;The British Journal of Criminology,1984

3. Elderly Victimization and Fear of Crime in Public Spaces;Ceccato;International Criminal Justice Review,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3