The Evidence-Based Investigative Tool (EBIT): a Legitimacy-Conscious Statistical Triage Process for High-Volume Crimes

Author:

McFadzien Kent,Pughsley Alan,Featherstone Andrew M.,Phillips John M.

Abstract

Abstract Research Question Based on the evidence at the end of a preliminary investigation of minor, non-domestic assault and public order cases, how accurately can the likelihood of a sanctioned detection be predicted for triage decisions while maintaining high awareness of legitimacy issues? Data Investigative records on assault and public order offences recorded by Kent Police, with a case-control sample of 522 randomly selected detected cases and 482 randomly selected undetected cases, a test sample of 931 cases, and an additional 7947 cases for testing the model on all eligible cases in the force area for the initial six months of its use. Methods A case control comparison between solved and unsolved cases produced a logistic regression model that was used to predict investigative outcomes in both the test sample and the complete tracking of its use in investigative operations. Findings Eight elements of evidence available by the end of the preliminary investigation were found to predict whether a sanctioned detection would result from further investigation: (1) victim supports police prosecution, and evidence includes (2) a named suspect, (3) a cooperative witness, (4) CCTV evidence, (5) confirming police testimony, (6) forensic evidence, (7) a connection to other cases and (8) a report of the crime to police less than 28 days after the incident occurred. When the EBIT was calibrated to identify only the 31% of cases most likely to yield a detection from further investigation, the model correctly forecast 97% of cases that would not be solved, producing only 3% false negatives. It also reduced the false-positive rate from 73 to 22% in cases that did not lead to a sanctioned detection. Conclusions A case control analysis of solvability factors at the end of a preliminary investigation can identify almost all of the cases that are likely to be solved, even while the model predicts that the majority of all cases at that point will not be solved.

Funder

University of Cambridge

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). A practical information-theoretic approach. In Model selection and multimodel inference (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

2. Burrows, J., & Tarling, R. (1987). The investigation of crime in England and Wales. The British Journal of Criminology, 27(3), 229–251.

3. Eck, J. E. (1979). Managing case assignments: the burglary investigation decision model replication.

4. Greenberg, B., Elliot, V. C., Kraft, L. P., & Procter, S. H. (1977). Felony investigation decision model: an analysis of investigative elements of information.

5. Greenwood, P. W. (1970). An analysis of the apprehension activities of the New York City Police Department.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Beyond Use-Cases: A Participatory Approach to Envisioning Data Science in Law Enforcement;The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency;2024-06-03

2. Exploring Police Perspectives on Algorithmic Transparency: A Qualitative Analysis of Police Interviews in the UK;Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization;2023-10-30

3. The Progression of Disparities within the Criminal Justice System: Differential Enforcement and Risk Assessment Instruments;2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency;2023-06-12

4. Intake and service staff: practices and challenges of a pivotal yet underexplored police occupation;Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice;2022-09-07

5. Transparency, Governance and Regulation of Algorithmic Tools Deployed in the Criminal Justice System: a UK Case Study;Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society;2022-07-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3