Community social capital, police performance, and trust in the police: Choices of policing styles in China

Author:

Cheng Chen1,Ruiting Zhou2,Shangxin Chi2

Affiliation:

1. School of Political Science and Public Administration, Huaqiao University , Quanzhou , China

2. School of Government, Shenzhen University , Shenzhen , China

Abstract

Abstract Recent empirical studies have underscored the crucial link between police performance and trust in the police. Nevertheless, the association between police performance and trust in the police under various conditions deserves more attention. Moreover, the collective meaning of social capital is largely omitted from previous studies on the impact of social capital on trust in the police. The current study explores how police performance impacts public trust across varying levels of community social capital. Using factor analysis and multilevel binary logistic regression on data from a survey of 997 respondents in Xiamen, China, the current study found that both police performance and community social capital significantly enhanced trust in the police, while community social capital moderated the relationship between police performance and trust in the police. As community social capital increases, the importance of procedural fairness in building police trust grows, whereas the impact of outcome effectiveness diminishes. Findings of the current study advocate for a tailored approach to policing: communities rich in social capital benefit from a focus on procedural fairness (process-oriented policing), whereas those with lower social capital prioritize the effectiveness of outcomes (outcome-oriented policing).

Funder

Shenzhen University Humanities and Social Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference61 articles.

1. ‘Public Assessments of the Police and Policing in Hong Kong.’;Adorjan;Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology,2017

2. ‘Performance in Public Organizations: Clarifying the Conceptual Space.’;Andersen;Public Administration Review,2016

3. ‘Perceptions of the Police: Past Findings, Methodological Issues, Conceptual Issues and Policy Implications.’;Benedict;Policing an International Journal of Police Strategies and Management,2002

4. ‘What Matters in Citizen Satisfaction with Police: A Meta-analysis.’;Bolger;Journal of Criminal Justice,2020

5. ‘Performance Measurement and Management.’;Bouckaert;Public Performance & Management Review,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3