Affiliation:
1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Anterior nasal swabs (ANS) are established specimen collection methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection detection. While saliva (SA) specimens provide an alternative, few studies have comprehensively characterized the performance of SA specimens in longitudinal studies.
Methods
We compared SARS-CoV-2 detections between paired self-collected ANS and SA specimens from a household transmission study. Participants recorded symptoms and paired ANS and SA specimens daily for 14 days. Specimens were tested using RT-PCR. We calculated the proportion of detections identified by each specimen type among the detections from both types combined. We computed percent agreement and Kappa statistics to assess concordance in detections. We also computed estimates stratified by presence of symptoms and examined the influence of traditional and inactivating transport media on the performance of ANS.
Results
We examined 2535 self-collected paired specimens from 216 participants. Among 1238 (49%) paired specimens with detections by either specimen type, ANS identified 77.1% (954; 95% CI, 74.6% to 79.3%) and SA 81.9% (1014; 95% CI, 79.7% to 84.0%), with a difference of 4.9% (95% CI, 1.4% to 8.5%). Overall agreement was 80.0%, and Kappa was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.6). Nevertheless, the difference in the proportion of detections identified by ANS and SA using traditional and inactivating transport media was 32.5% (95% CI, 26.8% to 38.0%) and –9.5% (95% CI, −13.7% to –5.2%), respectively. Among participants who remained asymptomatic, the difference in detections between SA and ANS was 51.2% (95% CI, 31.8% to 66.0%) and 26.1% (95% CI, 0% to 48.5%) using traditional and inactivating media, respectively.
Conclusions
Self-collected saliva specimens provide a noninvasive alternative to nasal swabs, especially to those collected in traditional transport media, for longitudinal field studies that aim to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Oncology
Reference31 articles.
1. Excess deaths from COVID-19 and other causes in the US, March 1, 2020, to January 2, 2021.;Woolf;JAMA,2021
2. Author correction: magnitude, demographics and dynamics of the effect;Kontis;Nat Med,2021
3. Asymptomatic transmission, the Achilles’ heel of current strategies to control Covid-19.;Gandhi;N Engl J Med,2020
4. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19.;He;Nat Med,2020
5. Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.;Larremore;Sci Adv,2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献