Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample

Author:

Thind Priyam1,Vargas Celibell Y1,Reed Carrie2ORCID,Wang Liqun3,Alba Luis R3,Larson Elaine L45,Saiman Lisa36,Stockwell Melissa S17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York, New York , USA

2. Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia , USA

3. Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York, New York , USA

4. School of Nursing, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York, New York , USA

5. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York, New York , USA

6. Department of Infection Prevention and Control, New York–Presbyterian Hospital , New York, New York , USA

7. Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York, New York , USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCommunity surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI) can include unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs. Little is known about use of self-swabs in low-income populations or among households including extended family members and the validity of self-collected swabs. We assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and validity of unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs in a low-income, community sample.MethodsThis was a substudy of a larger prospective community-based ARI surveillance study in 405 households in New York City. Participating household members self-collected swabs on the day of a research home visit for an index case, and for 3–6 subsequent days. Demographics associated with agreement to participate and swab collection were assessed, and index case self-collected versus research staff–collected swab results were compared.ResultsMost households (n = 292 [89.6%]) agreed to participate, including 1310 members. Being <18 years old, female, and the household reporter or member of the nuclear family (parents and children) were associated with both agreement to participate and self-swab collection. Being born in the United States or immigrating ≥10 years ago was associated with participation, and being Spanish-speaking and having less than a high school education were associated with swab collection. In all, 84.4% collected at least 1 self-swabbed specimen; self-swabbing rates were highest during the first 4 collection days. Concordance between research staff–collected swabs and self-swabs was 88.4% for negative swabs, 75.0% for influenza, and 69.4% for noninfluenza pathogens.ConclusionsSelf-swabbing was acceptable, feasible, and valid in this low-income, minoritized population. Some differences in participation and swab collection were identified that could be noted by future researchers and modelers.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3