Pain Management Best Practices from Multispecialty Organizations During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Public Health Crises

Author:

Cohen Steven P12ORCID,Baber Zafeer B3,Buvanendran Asokumar4,McLean Brian C5,Chen Yian6,Hooten W Michael7ORCID,Laker Scott R8,Wasan Ajay D9,Kennedy David J10,Sandbrink Friedhelm11,King Scott A12,Fowler Ian M13,Stojanovic Milan P14,Hayek Salim M15,Phillips Christopher R16

Affiliation:

1. Anesthesiology, Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pain Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Maryland

2. Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland

3. Division of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, Massachusetts

4. Anesthesiology and Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

5. US Army Pain Management Consultant, Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

7. Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, Mayo School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota

8. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado

9. Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, Pain Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

10. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

11. Pain Management Specialty Services Director, Veterans Health Administration, Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC

12. US Air Force Pain Management Consultant, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida

13. US Navy Pain Management Consultant, Director of Surgical Services, Naval Medical Center-San Diego, San Diego, California

14. Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Service, Interventional Pain Medicine, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

15. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

16. Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology Service, Naval Medical Center- San Diego, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background It is nearly impossible to overestimate the burden of chronic pain, which is associated with enormous personal and socioeconomic costs. Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability in the world, is associated with multiple psychiatric comorbidities, and has been causally linked to the opioid crisis. Access to pain treatment has been called a fundamental human right by numerous organizations. The current COVID-19 pandemic has strained medical resources, creating a dilemma for physicians charged with the responsibility to limit spread of the contagion and to treat the patients they are entrusted to care for. Methods To address these issues, an expert panel was convened that included pain management experts from the military, Veterans Health Administration, and academia. Endorsement from stakeholder societies was sought upon completion of the document within a one-week period. Results In these guidelines, we provide a framework for pain practitioners and institutions to balance the often-conflicting goals of risk mitigation for health care providers, risk mitigation for patients, conservation of resources, and access to pain management services. Specific issues discussed include general and intervention-specific risk mitigation, patient flow issues and staffing plans, telemedicine options, triaging recommendations, strategies to reduce psychological sequelae in health care providers, and resource utilization. Conclusions The COVID-19 public health crisis has strained health care systems, creating a conundrum for patients, pain medicine practitioners, hospital leaders, and regulatory officials. Although this document provides a framework for pain management services, systems-wide and individual decisions must take into account clinical considerations, regional health conditions, government and hospital directives, resource availability, and the welfare of health care providers.

Funder

MIRROR

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

US Department of Defense

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Clinical Neurology,General Medicine

Cited by 131 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3