Recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice guidelines in the US

Author:

Hertz Daniel L1,Bousman Chad A2,McLeod Howard L3,Monte Andrew A4,Voora Deepak5,Orlando Lori A6,Crutchley Rustin D7,Brown Benjamin8,Teeple Wrenda9,Rogers Sara10,Patel Jai N11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy , Ann Arbor, MI , USA

2. Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary , Calgary, AB , Canada

3. Center for Precision Medicine and Functional Genomics, Utah Tech University , St. George, UT , USA

4. Section of Pharmacology & Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, CO , USA

5. Duke Precision Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA

6. Department of Medicine, Duke University , Durham, NC , USA

7. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Manchester University , Fort Wayne, IN , USA

8. American Society of Pharmacovigilance , Houston, TX , USA

9. Arbit Consulting, LLC , Minneapolis, MN , USA

10. American Society of Pharmacovigilance , Houston, TX , and Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan, TX , USA

11. Department of Cancer Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health , Charlotte, NC , USA and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC , USA

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Pharmacogenetic testing can identify patients who may benefit from personalized drug treatment. However, clinical uptake of pharmacogenetic testing has been limited. Clinical practice guidelines recommend biomarker tests that the guideline authors deem to have demonstrated clinical utility, meaning that testing improves treatment outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the current status of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations within clinical practice guidelines in the US. Summary Guidelines were reviewed for pharmacogenetic testing recommendations for 21 gene-drug pairs that have well-established drug response associations and all of which are categorized as clinically actionable by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. The degree of consistency within and between organizations in pharmacogenetic testing recommendations was assessed. Relatively few clinical practice guidelines that provide a pharmacogenetic testing recommendation were identified. Testing recommendations for HLA-B*57:01 before initiation of abacavir and G6PD before initiation of rasburicase, both of which are included in drug labeling, were mostly consistent across guidelines. Gene-drug pairs with at least one clinical practice guideline recommending testing or stating that testing could be considered included CYP2C19-clopidogrel, CYP2D6-codeine, CYP2D6-tramadol, CYP2B6-efavirenz, TPMT-thiopurines, and NUDT15-thiopurines. Testing recommendations for the same gene-drug pair were often inconsistent between organizations and sometimes inconsistent between different guidelines from the same organization. Conclusion A standardized approach to evaluating the evidence of clinical utility for pharmacogenetic testing may increase the inclusion and consistency of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, which could benefit patients and society by increasing clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference94 articles.

1. The evaluation of genomic applications in practice and prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group;Teutsch;Genet Med,2009

2. Breaking a vicious cycle;Hayes;Sci Transl Med,2013

3. Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States. Final report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing;Holtzman;J Child Fam Nurs,1999

4. Evidence of clinical utility: an unmet need in molecular diagnostics for patients with cancer;Parkinson;Clin Cancer Res,2014

5. Clinical utility of genetic and genomic services: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics;ACMG Board of Directors;Genet Med,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Towards consensus recommendations for pharmacogenetics testing;American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy;2024-06-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3