Affiliation:
1. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
2. University of California, San Francisco
Abstract
Abstract
American policymakers have long focused on work as a key means to improve economic wellbeing. Yet, work has become increasingly precarious and polarized. This precarity is manifest in low wages but also in unstable and unpredictable work schedules that often vary significantly week to week with little advance notice. We draw on new survey data from The Shift Project on 37,263 hourly retail and food service workers in the United States. We assess the association between routine unpredictability in work schedules and household material hardship. Using both cross-sectional models and panel models, we find that workers who receive shorter advanced notice, those who work on-call, those who experience last minute shift cancellation and timing changes, and those with more volatile work hours are more likely to experience hunger, residential, medical, and utility hardships as well as more overall hardship. Just-in-time work schedules afford employers a great deal of flexibility but at a heavy cost to workers’ economic security.
Funder
Ford Foundation
Washington Center for Equitable Growth
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Russell Sage Foundation
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
William T. Grant Foundation
National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,History
Reference94 articles.
1. Stabilizing Low-Wage Work;Alexander;Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review.,2015
2. Measures of Material Hardship;Beverly;Journal of Poverty,2001
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献