This chapter is a re-examination of Pascal’s famous pragmatic argument (Pascal’s Wager) in support of wagering for God, first introduced in Pensées, Part III, §233. It is, in part, a consideration of whether Pascal is best interpreted as advocating a version of fictionalism about the Christian religion. Although it is ultimately concluded that Pascal should not be interpreted this way, his views are remarkably close to the religious fictionalist’s, and, in a sense, his views may be thought of as a precursor to religious fictionalism. In addition, this chapter is also a consideration of how a contemporary fictionalist might adapt Pascal’s argument. Although the new “factionalist” wager suffers from many of the same problems as Pascal’s original wager, it is not vulnerable to them all. In particular, fictionalists can dodge a thorny problem first raised by Antony Duff in 1986.