Gender Difference in Willingness and Capacity for Deliberation

Author:

Afsahi AfsounORCID

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the gender gap in deliberation, focusing on three facets: willingness to deliberate, capacity for deliberation, and facilitation techniques aimed at reducing the gender gap. It hypothesizes that women will be less willing to deliberate but more likely to engage in strictly defined desired deliberative behaviors. Relying on original survey and experimental data, this paper finds women to be more willing to deliberate. However, men’s negative deliberative behaviors—particularly cutting others off or dominating speech––undermine women’s efforts to be effective deliberators. Finally, the two innovative facilitation methods outlined in the article eliminate the gender gap.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Gender Studies

Reference114 articles.

1. Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities;Bächtiger;Journal of Political Philosophy,2010

2. Who takes the parliamentary floor? The role of gender in speech-making in the Swedish "Riksdag;Bäck;Political Research Quarterly,2014

3. Gender, political participation and electoral systems: A cross-national analysis;Beauregard;European Journal of Political Research,2014

4. Discursive inequity and the internal exclusion of women speakers;Beauvais;Political Research Quarterly: Online First,2019

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Diversified committees in hiring processes: Lab evidence on group dynamics;Journal of Economic Psychology;2023-08

2. Unequal inequalities? How participatory inequalities affect democratic legitimacy;European Political Science Review;2022-10-24

3. Reason against the machine? Future directions for mass online deliberation;Frontiers in Political Science;2022-10-05

4. The Body Speaks Before It Even Talks: Deliberation, Populism and Bodily Representation;Special Issue: Frontiers of Deliberative Democracy;2020-08-26

5. Deliberative democracy in the age of serial crisis;International Political Science Review;2020-08-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3