In vivo performance of a tri-leaflet mechanical heart valve prosthesis in an ovine model

Author:

Langenaeken Tom1ORCID,De Meester Pieter2ORCID,Verbrugghe Peter1ORCID,Rega Filip1ORCID,Lamberigts Marie1ORCID,Van Hecke Manon3ORCID,Van Hoof Lucas1ORCID,Meuris Bart1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Research Unit of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium

2. Congenital and Structural Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium

3. Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES We present the long-term results of a trileaflet (Triflo) versus bileaflet (On-X) mechanical valve in both aortic and pulmonary positions in a sheep model. METHODS The Triflo valve was implanted in 21 female sheep in aortic (n = 8) and pulmonary position (n = 13). The On-X valve was implanted in 7 female sheep in aortic (n = 1) and pulmonary (n = 6) positions. No antithrombotic medication of any kind was given postoperatively. In the aortic group, survival cohorts were 3 and 5 months. In the pulmonary group, survival cohorts were 10 and 20 weeks. Valve performance was assessed using haematology, echocardiography and acoustic measurements combined with post-mortem pathology analysis of the downstream organs. RESULTS The mean gradients were lower for the Triflo valve in both pulmonary [4.30 mmHg (3.70–5.73) vs 6.80 mmHg (4.63–7.96), P = 0.012] and aortic [5.1 mmHg (4.2–7.7) vs 10.7 mmHg (8.7–12.9), P = 0.007] positions. Peak gradients were lower for the Triflo valve in both pulmonary [8.05 mmHg (6.75–10.23) vs 13.15 mmHg (9.20–14.76), P = 0.005] and aortic [8.7 mmHg (7.5–12.5) vs 16.5 mmHg (14.2–19.6), P = 0.009] positions. In both positions, leaflets and housing surface were free from any deposits macro- and microscopically and comparable to nonimplanted control valves. Peripheral organs showed no signs of thrombo-embolic damage. Biochemical and haematological were comparable to preoperative. The closing click sound pressure level of the Triflo was significantly lower in both aortic [108.4 sound pressure level (102.0–115.7) vs 111.7 sound pressure level (105.5–117.0), P < 0.001] and pulmonary [103.6 sound pressure level (99.1–108.9) vs 118.5 sound pressure level (116.7–120.2), P < 0.001] position. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary in vivo results of the Triflo valve are promising in both aortic and pulmonary positions in an ovine model. Excellent haemodynamics, stable long-term function, low valve noise and no thrombo-embolic events in the absence of antithrombotic medication lay the foundation to a future clinical first-in-man trial.

Funder

Experimental Research Fund Cardiovascular Surgery

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3