Affiliation:
1. University Hospitals Leuven
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Animal models play a vital role in preclinical cardiovascular testing of materials. While sheep have traditionally served as the standard for preclinical cardiovascular testing, pigs are considered a superior option due to a more comparable coagulation system. This study aimed to compare the thrombogenicity of sheep and pigs in a pulmonary valve replacement model.
Methods
Pigs (n = 12) and sheep (n = 5) underwent pulmonary valve replacement using a bileaflet mechanical valve without any antithrombotic postoperatively. The follow-up period extended to 5 months or until valve thrombosis. Valve performance was evaluated through by cardiac ultrasounds complemented by post-mortem macro- and microscopical analysis of the valve and downstream organs.
Results
In the pig cohort, terminal valve thrombosis occurred in all but one animal within a month. In the sheep cohort, all animals completed the 5-month follow-up period and post-mortem examination revealed thrombi-free valves with both leaflet mobile.
Conclusion
Sheep demonstrated insufficient thrombogenicity to induce mechanical valve thrombosis, while pigs exhibited rapid and substantial thrombosis on mechanical valves. These findings support the recommendation to transition to pigs as the standard model for valve thrombosis research.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. The ‘ideal’ replacement heart valve;Sapirstein JS;Am Heart J,2001
2. The Medtronic Parallel valve and the lessons learned;Bodnar E;The Journal of heart valve disease,1996
3. The current state of in-vivo pre-clinical animal models for heart valve evaluation;Gallegos RP;J Heart Valve Dis,2005
4. Prevention of thrombus formation on rigid prosthetic heart valves by the ingrowth of autogenous tissue;Braunwald NS;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1967
5. Development of an artificial heart valve;Björk VO;Ann Thorac Surg,1990