Affiliation:
1. Hammersmith Hospital , London W12 0NN, UK
2. Cardiology Department, Harefield Hospital , Uxbridge UB9 6JH, UK
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundSubcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) are increasingly used in patients without a pacing indication, and may reduce venous complications, endocarditis and extraction morbidity. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator displacements may be less obvious than their transvenous counterparts.Case summaryA 59-year-old man was found to have dilated cardiomyopathy associated with heavy alcohol intake following investigation for a stroke. Despite 2 years of alcohol cessation and optimal drug therapy, his ejection fraction remained severely impaired, and he received an S-ICD using the manufacturer recommended screening and implant method, and by an experienced operator. Ten months later, inappropriate shocks were delivered despite optimal programming. Device displacement was demonstrated by lateral chest radiography on the second instance of inappropriate therapy. On the first admission, a lateral film was not performed, and simple device programming was undertaken which failed to prevent the second occurrence. The patient requested an explant; as ventricular function had improved following initiation of sacubutril/valsartan, the clinical team opted to remove the device.DiscussionCareful inspection of lateral chest films and review of device indication are needed to reduce the risk of inappropriate shocks. This is the first description of inappropriate device activity following lone generator displacement—lead displacement is well described.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine