A Solution to Separation in Binary Response Models

Author:

Zorn Christopher

Abstract

A common problem in models for dichotomous dependent variables is “separation,” which occurs when one or more of a model's covariates perfectly predict some binary outcome. Separation raises a particularly difficult set of issues, often forcing researchers to choose between omitting clearly important covariates and undertaking post—hoc data or estimation corrections. In this article I present a method for solving the separation problem, based on a penalized likelihood correction to the standard binomial GLM score function. I then apply this method to data from an important study on the postwar fate of leaders.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference59 articles.

1. Arguably the best textbook discussion of the problem is that in Venables and Ripley (2002, pp. 198–199), though even that treatment stops short of offering a clear remedy for the problem.

2. Limiting Buyer Discretion: Effects on Performance and Price in Long-Term Contracts

3. State-Sponsored Mass Murder

4. Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance

5. A middle–ground approach, taken by SAS and some others, is to calculate the (theoretically infinite) estimates but warn the researcher that separation is present; S–Plus and R also issue warnings in the case of complete separation, but not when separation is quasicomplete.

Cited by 201 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Binary classification with fuzzy logistic regression under class imbalance and complete separation in clinical studies;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2024-07-05

2. Bequests and the Demand for Life Insurance;North American Actuarial Journal;2024-05-29

3. Strike While the Iron is Hot: Land Trusts, Temperature Anomalies, and Agenda Setting for Local Open Space Referenda;Nonprofit Policy Forum;2024-04-03

4. The Changing Face of Nuclear Proliferation;International Studies Quarterly;2024-03-14

5. Discovering significant topics from legal decisions with selective inference;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-02-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3