Examining Differences in Parent Knowledge About Pediatric Food Allergies

Author:

Luke Anna K1ORCID,Flessner Christopher A1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Kent State University

Abstract

Abstract Objective Pediatric food allergy (FA) is a serious health condition that has become increasingly prevalent. Parents often play a primary role in assessing and managing risk for their child’s FAs, making it critical that they remain informed of the most recent guidelines for FA management. This study aimed to examine if diagnostic source (i.e., pediatrician vs. allergist) and child- and parent-level variables predicted parental FA knowledge using a comprehensive measure. Methods The Food Allergy Knowledge Test (FAKT) was administered to parents (N = 518) of children aged 3–17 years with (n = 349) and without (n = 169; i.e., control group) FAs using internet-sampling procedures. The sample was further partitioned into parents of children diagnosed by an allergist or a pediatrician, and control group parents who did or did not endorse knowing someone with an FA. Results Significant group differences were found with respect to the overall FAKT score and diagnostic source. Among the FA group, parental relationship to child, income, identification with a minority status, parental anxiety, and child possession of an emergency action plan were significant predictors of FAKT scores. Conclusions Knowledge of FA was poor across all groups. Education for caregivers both with and without food-allergic children is important to ensure FA safety in multiple settings. Future directions and limitations are discussed.

Funder

Kent State University Judie Fall Lasser Psychology Funds for Graduate Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference37 articles.

1. Diagnosis and management of food allergy;Abrams;Canadian Medical Association Journal,2016

2. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample;Antony;Psychological Assessment,1998

3. Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research;Aust;Behavior Research Methods,2013

4. IO and the crowd: Frequently asked questions about using Mechanical Turk for research;Barger;The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist,2011

5. Socioeconomic disparities in the economic impact of childhood food allergy;Bilaver;Pediatrics,2016

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3