Affiliation:
1. King's College London , UK
Abstract
Abstract
While games are commonly viewed as frivolous fun, their rapid proliferation across the US defense establishment compels us to think again. Spanning spheres as diverse as total immersion training, near-peer/cyber conflict, and future force strategies, a gaming renaissance is currently underway across the US military. Surprisingly, given international relations’ (IR) interest in the production and projection of military power, the discipline has neglected to engage with this revival. This article argues that hyperreal games—that is, games that produce realities—play an increasingly important role in the attraction, production, management, and recovery of warfighters. Drawing upon one hundred hours of interviews undertaken with US military games designers, trainers, trainees, and veterans between 2017 and 2019, the article documents first-hand experiences of hyperreal gaming in warfighter recruitment, training, deployment, and rehabilitation. The core argument developed is that unlike simulations, which model scenarios, games are productive of people, values, and identity. If it is to understand games’ use as a tool of warfighter subjectification, the article argues, IR must renew its focus on military gaming disaggregated from the broader hyperrealities of modeling, simulation, and exercises with which it has hitherto been conflated.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference123 articles.
1. “Unruly Bodies: The Rhetorical Domestication of Twenty-First-Century Veterans of War;Achter;Quarterly Journal of Speech,2010
2. “Where's the Diplomacy in Diplomacy? Using a Classic Board Game in ‘Introduction to International Relations’;Arnold;PS: Political Science & Politics,2015
3. “Playing Games with International Relations;Asal;International Studies Perspectives,2005
4. “Constructing International Relations Simulations: Examining the Pedagogy of IR Simulations through a Constructivist Learning Theory Lens;Asal;Journal of Political Science Education,2013
5. “The Eye of Power: The Politics of World Modeling;Ashley;International Organization,1983
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献