The Parentage Disruption: A Comparative Approach

Author:

Kessler Guillaume1

Affiliation:

1. CDPPOC Research Centre, University of Savoie Mont-Blanc, France

Abstract

Abstract The bionormative and heteronormative models of parentage has been challenged by multiple factors: a cultural shift, which has led to the decline of marriage and the development of cohabitation, a technological evolution, which has made it possible to develop new reproductive technologies, and a legal change that has led to the recognition of same-sex relationships. However, the extent of this development has not yet been fully assessed. Rather than simply adapting the rules designed according to an outdated model, it would be better to break with it permanently. This article proposes to build a new system based on intent and care, on the basis of case law and doctrinal proposals from several countries. Drawing from the best interests of the child standard, it operates a distinction between the status of parent and progenitor: whatever the circumstances of the birth (natural procreation, adoption, assisted reproduction technology, or surrogacy) and the nature of the parents' relationship (same-sex or heterosexual, married or unmarried, engaged in a romantic relationship or not), parentage would be based on a formal statement and the question of genetics limited to the determination of identity and the right to know one's origins.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference75 articles.

1. ‘A family is what you make it: legal recognition and regulation of multiple parents’;Abraham;American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law,2017

2. ‘Presuming women: revisiting the presumption of legitimacy in the same-sex couples era’;Appleton;Boston University Law Review,2008

3. ‘Arguments over parentage’,;Bainham;Cambridge Law Journal,2008

4. ‘Are you my mother? Parentage in nonconjugal family’;Bakht;Canadian Journal of Family Law,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pravo deteta na identitet u kontekstu pravila o anonimnosti donora;Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu;2023-03-27

2. The Law, Gender and Truth;Human Rights Law Review;2020-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3