Abstract
The right of the child to identity has been gaining importance in the efforts to revise legislation on donor anonymity in a large number of European countries. However, certain national legislations are still in favor of the concept of the identity disclosure prohibition, while some envision a mixed model, with the aim of balancing conflicting interests. The debate is centered on the donor and parent’s right to privacy and the child’s right to know their biological origins. An analysis of solutions from various European states, as well as the positions of the authorities overseeing the implementation of the most important treaties, has led to the development of guidelines when weighing interests in a conflict. Although an ideal solution is difficult to imagine, a system that protects the interests of all parties, focusing on the protection of the child’s rights, could be satisfactory.
Publisher
University of Belgrade Faculty of Law (Publications)
Reference30 articles.
1. Avramović, Dragutin, Dragan Mlađan. 2/2014. Vanredno stanje i vanredna situacija - Komparativni terminološki i sadržinski aspekti. Teme 38: 767-781.
2. Banić, Slavica. 2015. Uloga Ustavnog suda u izgradnji vladavine prava. 45-58. Uloga Ustavnog suda u izgradnji vladavine prava. Zbornik radova, ur. Lutz Kober, Miločer: Ustavni sud Crne Gore - Fondacija "Hanns Seidel".
3. Banjalučki centar za ljudska prava. 2020. Ljudska prava u periodu COVID-19. Utvrđeni propusti u ostvarivanju ljudskih prava u Bosni i Hercegovini. Banja Luka - Sarajevo: Misija OEBS-a u Bosni i Hercegovini.
4. Chiassoni, Pierluigi. 4/2021. Promoting the Rule of Rationality Over Positive Law and Legal Thinking. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 69: 785-792.
5. Diaz Crego, Maria, Silvia Kotanidis. 2020. States of Emergency in Response to the Coronavirus Crisis. Normative Response and Parliamentary Oversight in EU Member States During The First Wave Of The Pandemic - Study. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.