Artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support improves reproducibility of tumor response assessment in neuro-oncology: An international multi-reader study

Author:

Vollmuth Philipp1ORCID,Foltyn Martha1,Huang Raymond Y2,Galldiks Norbert345ORCID,Petersen Jens6,Isensee Fabian6,van den Bent Martin J7,Barkhof Frederik89,Park Ji Eun10ORCID,Park Yae Won11ORCID,Ahn Sung Soo11ORCID,Brugnara Gianluca1,Meredig Hagen1,Jain Rajan12,Smits Marion13ORCID,Pope Whitney B14,Maier-Hein Klaus6,Weller Michael15ORCID,Wen Patrick Y16,Wick Wolfgang1718ORCID,Bendszus Martin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital , Heidelberg , Germany

2. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

3. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany

4. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich , Juelich , Germany

5. Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen , Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf , Germany

6. Department of Medical Image Computing (MIC), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany

7. Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute , Rotterdam , the Netherlands

8. Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit , Amsterdam , the Netherlands

9. Institutes of Neurology & Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London , London , UK

10. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea

11. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea

12. Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine , New York, New York , USA

13. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine , Erasmus MC, Rotterdam , the Netherlands

14. Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, California , USA

15. Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland

16. Center for Neuro-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

17. Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital , Heidelberg , Germany

18. Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) within the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background To assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support allows more reproducible and standardized assessment of treatment response on MRI in neuro-oncology as compared to manual 2-dimensional measurements of tumor burden using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Methods A series of 30 patients (15 lower-grade gliomas, 15 glioblastoma) with availability of consecutive MRI scans was selected. The time to progression (TTP) on MRI was separately evaluated for each patient by 15 investigators over two rounds. In the first round the TTP was evaluated based on the RANO criteria, whereas in the second round the TTP was evaluated by incorporating additional information from AI-enhanced MRI sequences depicting the longitudinal changes in tumor volumes. The agreement of the TTP measurements between investigators was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) with confidence intervals (CI) and P-values obtained using bootstrap resampling. Results The CCC of TTP-measurements between investigators was 0.77 (95% CI = 0.69,0.88) with RANO alone and increased to 0.91 (95% CI = 0.82,0.95) with AI-based decision support (P = .005). This effect was significantly greater (P = .008) for patients with lower-grade gliomas (CCC = 0.70 [95% CI = 0.56,0.85] without vs. 0.90 [95% CI = 0.76,0.95] with AI-based decision support) as compared to glioblastoma (CCC = 0.83 [95% CI = 0.75,0.92] without vs. 0.86 [95% CI = 0.78,0.93] with AI-based decision support). Investigators with less years of experience judged the AI-based decision as more helpful (P = .02). Conclusions AI-based decision support has the potential to yield more reproducible and standardized assessment of treatment response in neuro-oncology as compared to manual 2-dimensional measurements of tumor burden, particularly in patients with lower-grade gliomas. A fully-functional version of this AI-based processing pipeline is provided as open-source (https://github.com/NeuroAI-HD/HD-GLIO-XNAT).

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Neurology (clinical),Oncology

Reference25 articles.

1. Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies;O’Connor;Nat Rev Clin Oncol.,2017

2. Response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials;Wen;J Clin Oncol.,2017

3. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group;Wen;J Clin Oncol.,2010

4. Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas;van den Bent;Lancet Oncol.,2011

5. Automatic assessment of glioma burden: a deep learning algorithm for fully automated volumetric and bidimensional measurement;Chang;Neuro Oncol.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3