Social Work as a Human Rights Profession: An Action Framework

Author:

Reynaert Didier1ORCID,Nachtergaele Siebren1,De Stercke Nadine1,Gobeyn Hildegard1,Roose Rudi2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Work, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, V. Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

2. Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy, Ghent University, Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Human rights are foundational to social work, as recognised in the global definition, leading many to consider social work a human rights profession. Although human rights has become an important compass for social work, comprehensive frameworks for understanding the ‘practice’ of human rights in social work are still limited. Only recently attempts have been made to fill this gap. This article seeks to continue these efforts and contribute to a better understanding of how social work constructs, deconstructs and reconstructs ideas of human rights in daily practice. We investigated the following research question: ‘How do social workers “act” when using human rights as a framework for practice?’ We used a qualitative research design consisting of ethnographic research and focus groups, with both social workers and service-users participating. Based on our research, we developed five building blocks for an action framework for human rights in social work: (i) systemworld-oriented action; (ii) lifeworld-oriented action; (iii) participatory action; (iv) joined-up action and (v) politicised action. These building blocks give a comprehensive account for the discursive practice of human rights in social work.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health(social science)

Reference33 articles.

1. Human rights as an opportunity and challenge for social work in a changing Norwegian welfare state’,;Alseth;European Journal of Social Work,2020

2. Practicing human rights in social work: Reflections and rights-based approaches’,;Androff;Journal of Human Rights and Social Work,2018

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology’,;Braun;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3