Women or Leaders? Practices of Narrating the United Nations as a Gendered Institution

Author:

Bode Ingvild1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Kent

Abstract

Abstract The United Nations has been an important forum for promoting women's rights, but women are still underrepresented at the most senior levels of its leadership. This points to persistent obstacles in reaching gender parity at the UN, despite the organization's overt commitment to this objective. Situated in feminist institutionalist insights, I argue that the institutionalization of gender inequality through practices in the UN as a gendered institution can account for continued barriers to women leadership. This makes contributions to feminist institutionalist literature in international relations by taking it to the individual microlevel. Gendered practices sustain, inform, and manifest themselves in four interconnected processes that reinforce gendered divisions of subordination: positional divides, symbols and imagery, everyday interactions, and individual identity (based on Acker 1990, 146–47; Scott 1986). These processes and their practices become accessible through the narrative analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted with senior women leaders at the UN. By recognizing their narratives as valid forms of insight into the study of the UN, this approach recognizes women leaders’ agency as opposed to portraying them as numbers only.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference110 articles.

1. Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations;Acker;Gender and Society,1990

2. From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions;Acker;Contemporary Sociology,1992

3. Feminist Methodologies in International Relations;Ackerly,2006

4. Moving People and Knowledge. Scientific Mobility in the European Union;Ackers;International Migration,2005

5. Gender and the EU's Support for Security Sector Reform in Fragile Contexts;Ansorg;JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,2018

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3