Regulating Untaxable Externalities: Are Vehicle Air Pollution Standards Effective and Efficient?

Author:

Jacobsen Mark R1,Sallee James M2,Shapiro Joseph S3,van Benthem Arthur A4

Affiliation:

1. University of California, San Diego , and National Bureau of Economic Research , United States

2. University of California, Berkeley , and National Bureau of Economic Research , United States

3. University of California, Berkeley, and National Bureau of Economic Research , United States

4. University of Pennsylvania, and National Bureau of Economic Research , United States

Abstract

AbstractThe world has 1.4 billion passenger vehicles. How should governments regulate their air pollution emissions? A Pigouvian tax is technologically infeasible. Most countries instead rely on exhaust standards that limit air pollution emissions per mile for new vehicles. We assess the effectiveness and efficiency of these standards, which are the centerpiece of U.S. Clean Air Act regulation of transportation, and counterfactual policies. We show that the air pollution emissions per mile of new U.S. vehicles has fallen spectacularly, by over 99%, since standards began in 1967. Several research designs with a half century of data suggest that exhaust standards have caused most of this decline. Yet exhaust standards are not cost-effective in part because they fail to encourage scrap of older vehicles, which account for the majority of emissions. To study counterfactual policies, we develop an analytical and a quantitative model of the vehicle fleet. Analysis of these models suggests that tighter exhaust standards increase social welfare and increasing registration fees on dirty vehicles yields even larger gains by accelerating scrap, although both reforms have complex effects on inequality.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference118 articles.

1. “Welfare Implications of Car Feebates: A Simulation Analysis,”;Adamou,2013

2. “A Study of Emissions from Light Duty Vehicles in Six Cities,”;AES,1973

3. “Automobile Inspection and Readjustment (AIR) Program Annual Report Calendar Year 2014;AIR,2015

4. “Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax;Allcott;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2019

5. “Designing Policies to Make Cars Greener: A Review of the Literature;Anderson;Annual Review of Resource Economics,2016

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3