Optimization of therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with ceftazidime and meropenem using chemostats as model for infections

Author:

Feng Yanfang1,Bakker Roosmarijn T1,van Hest Reinier M2,Hodiamont Caspar J3,Brul Stanley1,Schultsz Constance34,ter Kuile Benno H15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Molecular Biology and Microbial Food Safety, Swammerdam Institute of Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2. Department of Hospital Pharmacy & Clinical Pharmacology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105AZ, the Netherlands

3. Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105AZ, the Netherlands

4. Department of Global Health-Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam 1105AZ, the Netherlands

5. Office for Risk Assessment and Research Coordination Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, Utrecht 3511GG, the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause life-threatening infections in patients admitted to intensive care units. Resistance rapidly develops against two drugs of choice: ceftazidime and meropenem. Several therapeutic protocols were compared for reduction in viable cells and limiting development of resistance. Chemostat cultures were exposed to antibiotic concentrations measured in the blood of patients at low (5th percentile), medium (50th percentile) or high (95th percentile) levels in several therapy protocols to simulate therapy. Cultures exposed to ceftazidime recovered after 1 day at low, 2 days at medium and 3 days at high concentrations and developed corresponding levels of resistance. Patterns were very similar for meropenem except that recovery was delayed. Fluctuating levels and intermittent treatment achieved similar reduction of cell numbers at lower resistance costs. Treatment alternating ceftazidime and meropenem reduced cell numbers more than monotherapy, while strongly limiting resistance. Combination therapy was even more effective in both respects. Therapeutic goals are best reached with least risk of resistance when ceftazidime and meropenem are used in combination or alternating, at the highest concentrations the patient can endure. Monotherapy should also apply the highest concentration that is safe for the shortest time that achieves treatment objectives.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Molecular Biology,Microbiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3