The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity

Author:

Yang Pu123,Mi Zhifu1ORCID,Wei Yi-Ming45,Hanssen Steef V6,Liu Lan-Cui7,Coffman D’Maris1,Sun Xinlu1,Liao Hua45,Yao Yun-Fei89,Kang Jia-Ning45,Wang Peng-Tao45,Davis Steven J10

Affiliation:

1. The Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London , London WC1E 7HB, UK

2. Energy and Power Group, University of Oxford , Oxford OX2 0ES, UK

3. Exeter Sustainable Finance Centre, University of Exeter , Exeter EX4 4PU, UK

4. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology , Beijing 100081 , China

5. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology , Beijing 100081 , China

6. Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Radboud University , Nijmegen 6500 GL, The Netherlands

7. Business School, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875 , China

8. Strategy Plan Department, Sinopec   , Beijing 100101 , China

9. Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering   , Beijing 100101 , China

10. Department of Earth System Science, University of California , Irvine, CA 92697 , USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Limiting climate change to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions would entail substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere by the mid-century, but how much CDR is needed at country level over time is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of when and how much CDR is required at country level in order to achieve 1.5°C and how much CDR countries can carry out domestically. We allocate global CDR pathways among 170 countries according to 6 equity principles and assess these allocations with respect to countries’ biophysical and geophysical capacity to deploy CDR. Allocating global CDR to countries based on these principles suggests that CDR will, on average, represent ∼4% of nations’ total emissions in 2030, rising to ∼17% in 2040. Moreover, equitable allocations of CDR, in many cases, exceed implied land and carbon storage capacities. We estimate ∼15% of countries (25) would have insufficient land to contribute an equitable share of global CDR, and ∼40% of countries (71) would have insufficient geological storage capacity. Unless more diverse CDR technologies are developed, the mismatch between CDR liabilities and land-based CDR capacities will lead to global demand for six GtCO2 carbon credits from 2020 to 2050. This demonstrates an imperative demand for international carbon trading of CDR.

Funder

Royal Society

British Council

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3