Giant Gaussian process models of geomagnetic palaeosecular variation: a directional outlook

Author:

Brandt Daniele1ORCID,Constable Catherine2ORCID,Ernesto Marcia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Departamento de Geofísica, 05508–900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

2. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0225, USA

Abstract

SUMMARY Assessment of long-term palaeosecular variation (PSV) of the geomagnetic field is frequently based on simplified versions of a class of statistical models known as giant Gaussian processes (GGP) used to represent temporal variations in spherical harmonic descriptions of the field. Here we propose a new type of analysis to assess the shape and dispersion of the directional distributions caused by PSV. The quantities analysed in this study are equal-area coordinates of rotated distributions of palaeomagnetic directions, ${x_E}$ (east−west) and ${x_N}\ $(north−south) and their standard deviations (${\sigma _E}$ and ${\sigma _N}$). These are easy to determine, and can readily be numerically predicted for any GGP model, avoiding the need for the numerous simulations generally used to determine the scatter and/or elongation of directional distributions. Mean predictions of $\overline {{x_N}} $ for a simplified GGP model are different from the expected geocentric axial dipole (GAD) directions, in agreement with inclination differences noted in previous studies. The best estimates for palaeomagnetic inclination are the expected directions from the mean of virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs) calculated using an iterative angular cut-off process. Predictions of ${\sigma _{\rm E}}$ and ${\sigma _{\rm N}}$ vary with latitude and are symmetric about the Equator. The N–S direction (${\sigma _{\rm N}}$) is always larger than E–W (${\sigma _{\rm E}}$), but the difference decreases from a maximum at the Equator to the poles, where ${\sigma _{\rm N}} = \ {\sigma _{\rm E}}$. A simplified GGP model is used to show that the parameter α (affecting variances in all Gauss coefficients) is positively correlated with ${\sigma _{\rm E}}$ and ${\sigma _{\rm N}}\ $ while the β parameter, the ratio of dipole to quadrupole family standard deviations, modifies the latitudinal dependence of ${\sigma _{\rm E}}$ and ${\sigma _{\rm N}}$. Experimental error in ${\sigma _{\rm E}}$ and ${\sigma _{\rm N}}$ can be accommodated using the common statistical parameters found in palaeomagnetic data sets, as ${\alpha _{95}}$ from site-mean directions. Predictions of simplified GGP models are compared with both numerical simulations and real data spanning the last 10 Ma. The latitudinal dependence of the proposed measures of PSV (${\sigma _{\rm E}}$ and ${\sigma _N}$) provide useful diagnostics for testing the validity of a GGP model. For the past 10 Ma the best-fitting GGP model with a mean GAD field set to $g_1^0 = \ - 18\ \mu T$ has α = 6.7 µT and β = 4.2. These new directional diagnostics will be used to investigate changes in overall geomagnetic field behaviour over other geological time intervals.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Bootstrap Common Mean Direction Test;Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth;2023-08

2. Detecting dipolarity of the geomagnetic field in the paleomagnetic record;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2023-06-12

3. Palaeosecular variation in Northern Patagonia recorded by 0–5 Ma Caviahue–Copahue lava flows;Geophysical Journal International;2023-04-18

4. Assessing inclination flattening in the Holocene: insights from sediment data and global models;Geophysical Journal International;2022-12-26

5. Paleosecular variation record from Pleistocene-Holocene lava flows in southern Colombia;Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors;2022-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3