A potential post-perovskite province in D″ beneath the Eastern Pacific: evidence from new analysis of discrepant SKS–SKKS shear-wave splitting

Abstract

SUMMARY Observations of seismic anisotropy in the lowermost mantle—D″—are abundant. As seismic anisotropy is known to develop as a response to plastic flow in the mantle, constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy allows us to better understand mantle dynamics. Measuring shear-wave splitting in body wave phases which traverse the lowermost mantle is a powerful tool to constrain this anisotropy. Isolating a signal from lowermost mantle anisotropy requires the use of multiple shear-wave phases, such as SKS and SKKS. These phases can also be used to constrain azimuthal anisotropy in D″: the ray paths of SKS and SKKS are nearly coincident in the upper mantle but diverge significantly at the core–mantle boundary. Any significant discrepancy in the shear-wave splitting measured for each phase can be ascribed to anisotropy in D″. We search for statistically significant discrepancies in shear-wave splitting measured for a data set of 420 SKS–SKKS event–station pairs that sample D″ beneath the Eastern Pacific. To ensure robust results, we develop a new multiparameter approach which combines a measure derived from the eigenvalue minimization approach for measuring shear-wave splitting with an existing splitting intensity method. This combined approach allows for easier automation of discrepant shear-wave splitting analysis. Using this approach we identify 30 SKS–SKKS event–station pairs as discrepant. These predominantly sit along a backazimuth range of 260°–290°. From our results we interpret a region of azimuthal anisotropy in D″ beneath the Eastern Pacific, characterized by null SKS splitting, and mean delay time of $1.15 \, \mathrm{ s}$ in SKKS. These measurements corroborate and expand upon previous observations made using SKS–SKKS and S–ScS phases in this region. Our preferred explanation for this anisotropy is the lattice-preferred orientation of post-perovskite. A plausible mechanism for the deformation causing this anisotropy is the impingement of subducted material from the Farallon slab at the core–mantle boundary.