Diet Quality following Total Meal Replacement Compared with Food-Based Weight-Loss Diets in Postmenopausal Women with Obesity: A Secondary Analysis of the TEMPO Diet Trial

Author:

Pattinson Andrea L1ORCID,Seimon Radhika V1ORCID,Harper Claudia1,Nassar Natasha2ORCID,Grech Amanda3ORCID,Santoso Eunike A1,Franklin Janet4,Inan-Eroglu Elif5,Gibson Alice A6,Sainsbury Amanda7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

2. Child Population and Translational Health Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

3. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4. Metabolism & Obesity Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

5. Charles Perkins Centre, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

6. Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

7. School of Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Severely energy-restricted diets that utilize meal-replacement products are the most effective dietary treatment for obesity. However, there are concerns they may fail to educate individuals on how to adopt a healthy food-based diet after weight loss. Objectives The aim of this research was to compare changes in diet quality following total meal replacement compared with food-based weight-loss diets. Methods In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 79 postmenopausal women aged 45–65 y, with a BMI (in kg/m2) of 30–40, were randomly assigned to either a total meal-replacement diet (energy intake restricted by 65–75% relative to requirements) for 16 wks, followed by a food-based diet (energy intake restricted by 25–35% relative to requirements) until 52 wks, or the food-based diet for the entire 52-wk period. Diet quality was scored at baseline and 52 wks using the Healthy Eating Index for Australian Adults, with score changes compared between groups using an independent t test. Results Diet quality improved from baseline in both groups, but less so in the total meal-replacement group, with a mean (SD) increase of 3.6 (10.8) points compared with 11.8 (13.9) points in the food-based group, resulting in a mean between-group difference of −8.2 (P = 0.004; 95% CI: –13.8, –2.7) points. This improvement in diet quality within both groups was mostly driven by a reduction in the intake of discretionary foods. Intake remained below the recommendations at 52 wks for 4 of the 5 food groups in both dietary interventions. Conclusions In postmenopausal women with obesity, weight-loss interventions that involve either a total meal-replacement diet or a food-based diet both improve diet quality, however, not sufficiently to meet recommendations. This highlights the importance of addressing diet quality as a part of all dietary weight-loss interventions. This trial is registered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry as 12612000651886.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

University of Sydney

Pharmacy Guild of Australia

Novo Nordisk

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3