Evidence of detrimental effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on offspring birthweight and neurodevelopment from a systematic review of quasi-experimental studies

Author:

Mamluk Loubaba123ORCID,Jones Timothy23,Ijaz Sharea23,Edwards Hannah B23,Savović Jelena23,Leach Verity23,Moore Theresa H M23,von Hinke Stephanie4,Lewis Sarah J2,Donovan Jenny L23,Lawlor Deborah A1235,Davey Smith George125ORCID,Fraser Abigail125,Zuccolo Luisa12

Affiliation:

1. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

2. Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

3. NIHR ARC West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK

4. Department of Economics, School of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

5. NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Systematic reviews of prenatal alcohol exposure effects generally only include conventional observational studies. However, estimates from such studies are prone to confounding and other biases. Objectives To systematically review the evidence on the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational designs using alternative analytical approaches to improve causal inference. Search strategy Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PsychINFO from inception to 21 June 2018. Manual searches of reference lists of retrieved papers. Selection criteria RCTs of interventions to stop/reduce drinking in pregnancy and observational studies using alternative analytical methods (quasi-experimental studies e.g. Mendelian randomization and natural experiments, negative control comparisons) to determine the causal effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on pregnancy and longer-term offspring outcomes in human studies. Data collection and analysis One reviewer extracted data and another checked extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using customized risk of bias tools. A narrative synthesis of findings was carried out and a meta-analysis for one outcome. Main results Twenty-three studies were included, representing five types of study design, including 1 RCT, 9 Mendelian randomization and 7 natural experiment studies, and reporting on over 30 outcomes. One study design–outcome combination included enough independent results to meta-analyse. Based on evidence from several studies, we found a likely causal detrimental role of prenatal alcohol exposure on cognitive outcomes, and weaker evidence for a role in low birthweight. Conclusion None of the included studies was judged to be at low risk of bias in all domains, results should therefore be interpreted with caution. Systematic review registration This study is registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD42015015941

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Health Research and Care West

NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre

Medical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit

NIHR CLAHRC West

UK MRC

University of Bristol

UK Medical Research Council

US National Institute of Health

European Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3