Defining a systems framework for characterizing physical work demands with wearable sensors

Author:

Stirling Leia1ORCID,Acosta-Sojo Yadrianna2ORCID,Dennerlein Jack T3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Industrial and Operations Engineering Department, Robotics Department, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI 48109 , United States

2. Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, Auburn University , Auburn, AL 36849 , United States

3. Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University , Boston, MA 02215 , United States

Abstract

Abstract Measuring the physical demands of work is important in understanding the relationship between exposure to these job demands and their impact on the safety, health, and well-being of working people. However, work is changing and our knowledge of job demands should also evolve in anticipation of these changes. New opportunities exist for noninvasive long-term measures of physical demands through wearable motion sensors, including inertial measurement units, heart rate monitors, and muscle activity monitors. Inertial measurement units combine accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers to provide continuous measurement of a segment’s motion and the ability to estimate orientation in 3-dimensional space. There is a need for a system-thinking perspective on how and when to apply these wearable sensors within the context of research and practice surrounding the measurement of physical job demands. In this paper, a framework is presented for measuring the physical work demands that can guide designers, researchers, and users to integrate and implement these advanced sensor technologies in a way that is relevant to the decision-making needs for physical demand assessment. We (i) present a literature review of the way physical demands are currently being measured, (ii) present a framework that extends the International Classification of Functioning to guide how technology can measure the facets of work, (iii) provide a background on wearable motion sensing, and (iv) define 3 categories of decision-making that influence the questions that we can ask and measures that are needed. By forming questions within these categories at each level of the framework, this approach encourages thinking about the systems-level problems inherent in the workplace and how they manifest at different scales. Applying this framework provides a systems approach to guide study designs and methodological approaches to study how work is changing and how it impacts worker safety, health, and well-being.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference102 articles.

1. Work-Related exposures and musculoskeletal disorder symptoms among informal E-waste recyclers at Agbogbloshie, Ghana;Acquah,2021

2. Influence of the wearable posture correction sensor on head and neck posture: sitting and standing workstations;Ailneni,2019

3. Assessment of the accuracy of physical activity questionnaire occupational data;Ainsworth;J Occup Med,1993

4. A hand speed–duty cycle equation for estimating the ACGIH hand activity level rating;Akkas;Ergonomics,2015

5. OpenSense: an open-source toolbox for Inertial-Measurement-Unit-based measurement of lower extremity kinematics over long durations;Al Borno;J Neuroeng Rehabil.,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3