Performance Comparison of N95 and P100 Filtering Facepiece Respirators with Presence of Artificial Leakage

Author:

Zhu Jintuo123ORCID,He Xinjian4,Guffey Steve4,Wang Liang13,Wang Haifeng123,Cheng Jianwei13

Affiliation:

1. Key Laboratory of Gas and Fire Control for Coal Mines (China University of Mining and Technology), Ministry of Education, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China

2. National Professional Laboratory for Fundamental Research of Mine Gas and Dust Control Technology, School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China

3. School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China

4. Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health–approved P100 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) have a higher filter efficiency compared to the N95 filters. However, the former typically produce higher flow resistance (Rf). Consequently, when faceseal leakage is present, the proportion of leakage airflow for P100 FFRs may exceed that of N95s, resulting in a higher total inward leakage (TIL) of the P100.MethodsIn this manikin-based study, the performance of two pairs of N95 and P100 FFRs (N95-A versus P100-A; N95-B versus P100-B) were compared under five sealing conditions (fully sealed and partially sealed with one, two, or three leaks of 0.8-mm, and one 2-mm leak). Sodium chloride particles (CMD ~45 nm) were used as the challenge aerosol. Respirators were tested under three constant flows (15, 50, and 85 L/min) and three cyclic flows (mean inspiratory flow = 15, 50, and 85 L/min). Both filter penetration (Pfilter) and TIL were determined. The Rf under constant flows was recorded. Based on Pfilter, TIL, and Rf, the quality factor (qf) was calculated to compare the overall performance of N95 and P100 FFRs.ResultsFor a fully sealed condition, the Pfilter was much lower for the P100 FFRs than for the N95 FFRs. When small leaks were inserted (0.8-mm and 2 × 0.8-mm), the TIL was higher for the P100 FFRs than for the N95 FFRs under the lowest tested flow (15 L/min), while for greater leaks (3 × 0.8-mm and 2-mm), the TIL of the P100 FFRs was always higher regardless of the flow. The Rf of P100 FFRs was measured twice as high as the N95. The qf values were also found higher for the N95 FFRs than for the P100 FFRs regardless of leak size and breathing flow.ConclusionsWith the presence of artificial leakage, a P100 FFR with high-flow-resistance may not be as protective as a low-flow-resistance N95 FFR. This finding suggests that future efforts should be directed to reducing the breathing resistance when designing P100 FFRs.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference37 articles.

1. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles;Balazy;Ann Occup Hyg,2006

2. Correlation of respirator fit measured on human subjects and a static advanced headform;Bergman;J Occup Environ Hyg,2015

3. Filter efficiency as a function of nanoparticle velocity and shape;Boskovic;J Aerosol Sci,2008

4. Filtration of nanosized particles with different shape on oil coated fibres;Boskovic;J Aerosol Sci,2007

5. The theoretical effect of filter resistance and filter penetration on respirator protection factors;Campbell;J Int Soc Respir Prot,1984

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3