Do You Feel Welcome? Gendered Experiences in International Security Studies

Author:

Rublee Maria Rost1ORCID,Jackson Emily B2,Parajon Eric2,Peterson Susan2,Duncombe Constance1

Affiliation:

1. Monash University

2. College of William and Mary

Abstract

Abstract Unlike in the broader field of international relations, relatively little research on gender representation and gendered experiences exists within the subfield of security studies. This article begins to fill that gap by sharing the results of a 2019 survey of members of the International Security Studies Section (ISSS) of the International Studies Association (ISA). The survey results show striking gender differences in members’ experiences, with women more likely than men to describe ISSS as “insular,” “clubby,” and an “Old Boys’ Network”; more likely to report experiences of hostility and exclusion; and more likely to believe that diversity initiatives are needed. Our analysis reveals that women in the ISSS report (1) harassment, (2) negative experiences participating in various section activities, (3) more significant barriers to attending and being selected for the section's ISA program, and (4) a sense of feeling unwelcome at ISSS meetings, all at higher rates than male respondents.

Funder

International Security Studies Section

International Studies Association

Carnegie Corporation of New York

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. “Engaging Women: Addressing the Gender Gap in Women's Networking and Productivity.”;Barnes;PS: Political Science & Politics,2017

2. “A Divided Discipline? Mapping Peace and Conflict Studies.”;Bright;International Studies Perspectives,2018

3. “Gender and Journal Authorship in Eight Prestigious Political Science Journals.”;Breuning;PS: Political Science and Politics,2007

4. “Finding the Invisible Women: Gender Stereotypes versus Student Interest in Foreign Policy and Security Subfields.”;Buhr;PS: Political Science & Politics,2015

5. “Gender Bias in International Relations Graduate Education? New Evidence from Syllabi.”;Colgan;PS: Political Science & Politics,2017

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3