Abstract
Abstract
This article examines whether there is a US bias affecting how American political scientist study nuclear weapons and their effects. US dominance in the production and dissemination of political science literature on nuclear weapons is reflected in concepts and theories of their spread and use, as well as prominent datasets on nuclear proliferation. More broadly, is there a US bias in scholarship on nuclear weapons produced by American political scientist? In this article I examine whether there is a US bias that affects what is studied, what kinds of questions are asked and what cases are examined, and how the evidence is interpreted.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference29 articles.
1. “Contra-Proliferation: Interpreting the Meanings of India's Nuclear Tests in 1974 and 1998.”;Abraham,2009
2. “Understanding the US–Russia Nuclear Schism.”;Arbatov;Survival,2017
3. “Beyond Emboldenment: How Acquiring Nuclear Weapons Can Change Foreign Policy.”;Bell;International Security,2015
4. “On the Objectives of Arms Control.”;Brodie;International Security,1976
5. “Norway's Nuclear Odyssey: From Optimistic Proponent to Nonproliferator.”;Forland;Nonproliferation Review,1997
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献