Zinc Absorption From Agronomically Biofortified Wheat Is Similar to Post-Harvest Fortified Wheat and Is a Substantial Source of Bioavailable Zinc in Humans

Author:

Signorell Coralie1,Zimmermann Michael B1,Cakmak Ismail2,Wegmüller Rita1,Zeder Christophe1ORCID,Hurrell Richard1,Aciksoz Seher B3,Boy Erick4,Tay Fabian5,Frossard Emmanuel3,Moretti Diego1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

2. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey

3. Plant Nutrition Laboratory, Institute for Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Lindau, Switzerland

4. Harvest Plus, c/o IFPRI, Washington, DC

5. Clinical Trials Center, Center for Clinical Research, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Limited data exist on human zinc absorption from wheat biofortified via foliar (FBW) or root (hydroponically fortified wheat, HBW) zinc application. Stable isotope labels added at point of consumption (extrinsic labeling) might not reflect absorption from native zinc obtained by intrinsic labeling. Objectives We measured fractional and total zinc absorption (FAZ, TAZ) in FBW and HBW wheat, compared with control wheat (CW) and fortified wheat (FW). The effect of labeling method was assessed in HBW (study 1), and the effect of milling extraction rate (EXR, 80% and 100%) in FBW (studies 2 and 3). Methods Generally healthy adults (n = 71, age: 18–45 y, body mass index: 18.5–25 kg/m2) were allocated to 1 of the studies, in which they served as their own controls. In study 1, men and women consumed wheat porridges colabeled intrinsically and extrinsically with 67Zn and 70Zn. In studies 2 and 3, women consumed wheat flatbreads (chapatis) labeled extrinsically. Zinc absorption was measured with the oral to intravenous tracer ratio method with a 4-wk wash-out period between meals. Data were analyzed with linear mixed models. Results In study 1 there were no differences in zinc absorption from extrinsic versus intrinsic labels in either FW or HBW. Similarly, FAZ and TAZ from FW and HBW did not differ. TAZ was 70–76% higher in FW and HBW compared with CW (P < 0.01). In studies 2 and 3, TAZ from FW and FBW did not differ but was 20–48% higher compared with CW (P < 0.001). Extraction rate had no effect on TAZ. Conclusions Colabeling demonstrates that extrinsic zinc isotopic labels can be used to accurately quantify zinc absorption from wheat in humans. Biofortification through foliar zinc application, root zinc application, or fortification provides higher TAZ compared with unfortified wheat. In biofortified wheat, extraction rate (100–80%) has a limited impact on total zinc absorption. These studies were registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01775319).

Funder

HarvestPlus

European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference35 articles.

1. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences;Black;Lancet North Am Ed,2008

2. Biofortification of staple food crops;Nestel;J Nutr,2006

3. Technical document #1. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control;Brown;Food Nutr Bull,2004

4. Enrichment of fertilizers with zinc: an excellent investment for humanity and crop production in India;Cakmak;J Trace Elem Med Biol,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3