The PERCEIVE quantitative study: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower-limb amputation: protocol for a collaboratiVE study

Author:

Gwilym Brenig L1,Waldron Cherry-Ann2ORCID,Thomas-Jones Emma2,Preece Ryan3ORCID,Milosevic Sarah2,Brookes-Howell Lucy2,Pallmann Philip2,Harris Debbie2,Massey Ian4,Burton Jo4,Stewart Philippa4,Samuel Katie5,Jones Sian6,Cox David6,Edwards Adrian7,Twine Chris8ORCID,Bosanquet David C1ORCID,Ambler G K,Benson R,Dattani N,Dovell G,Forsythe R,Hitchman L,Nandhra S,Onida S,Saratzis A,Shalhoub J,

Affiliation:

1. Gwent Vascular Institute, Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK

2. Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

3. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK

4. Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK

5. Department of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

6. C/O INVOLVE Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK

7. Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

8. Bristol, Bath and Weston Vascular Network, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate prediction of outcomes following surgery with high morbidity and mortality rates is essential for informed shared decision-making between patients and clinicians. It is unknown how accurately healthcare professionals predict outcomes following major lower-limb amputation (MLLA). Several MLLA outcome-prediction tools have been developed. These could be valuable in clinical practice, but most require validation in independent cohorts before routine clinical use can be recommended. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes in adult patients undergoing MLLA for complications of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) or diabetes. Secondary aims include the validation of existing outcome-prediction tools. Method This study is an international, multicentre prospective observational study including adult patients undergoing a primary MLLA for CLTI or diabetes. Healthcare professionals’ accuracy in predicting outcomes at 30-days (death, morbidity and MLLA revision) and 1-year (death, MLLA revision and ambulation) will be evaluated. Sixteen existing outcome-prediction tools specific to MLLA will be examined for validity. Data collection began on 1 October 2020; the end of follow-up will be 1 May 2022. The C-statistic, Hosmer–Lemeshow test, reclassification tables and Brier score will be used to evaluate the predictive performance of healthcare professionals and prediction tools, respectively. Study registration and dissemination This study will be registered locally at each centre in accordance with local policies before commencing data collection, overseen by local clinician leads. Results will be disseminated to all centres, and any subsequent presentation(s) and/or publication(s) will follow a collaborative co-authorship model.

Funder

Research for Patient and Public Benefit (RfPPB) programme, Health and Care Research Wales

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3