Affiliation:
1. University of California Berkeley
2. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, and NBER
3. University of California Berkeley and NBER
Abstract
Abstract
Measuring consumer responsiveness to medical care prices is a central issue in health economics and a key ingredient in the optimal design and regulation of health insurance markets. We leverage a natural experiment at a large self-insured firm that required all of its employees to switch from an insurance plan that provided free health care to a nonlinear, high-deductible plan. The switch caused a spending reduction between 11.8% and 13.8% of total firm-wide health spending. We decompose this spending reduction into the components of (i) consumer price shopping, (ii) quantity reductions, and (iii) quantity substitutions and find that spending reductions are entirely due to outright reductions in quantity. We find no evidence of consumers learning to price shop after two years in high-deductible coverage. Consumers reduce quantities across the spectrum of health care services, including potentially valuable care (e.g., preventive services) and potentially wasteful care (e.g., imaging services). To better understand these changes, we study how consumers respond to the complex structure of the high-deductible contract. Consumers respond heavily to spot prices at the time of care, reducing their spending by 42% when under the deductible, conditional on their true expected end-of-year price and their prior year end-of-year marginal price. There is no evidence of learning to respond to the true shadow price in the second year post-switch.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference45 articles.
1. “Prescription Drug Use under Medicare Part D: A Linear Model of Nonlinear Budget Sets,”;Abaluck,2015
2. “Putting Health Back into Health Insurance Choice,”;Anastov;Medical Care Research Review,2014
3. “The RAND Health Insurance Experiment, Three Decades Later,”;Aron-Dine;Journal of Economic Perspectives,2013
4. “Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: Do Dynamic Incentives Matter?,”;Aron-Dine;Review of Economics and Statistics,2015
5. “Behavioral Hazard in Health Insurance,”;Baicker;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2015
Cited by
233 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献