The impact of telehealth cost‐sharing on healthcare utilization: Evidence from high‐deductible health plans

Author:

Gidwani Risha12ORCID,Yank Veronica3,Burgette Lane4ORCID,Kofner Aaron4,Asch Steven M.5,Wagner Zachary1

Affiliation:

1. Economics, Sociology, and Statistics (ESS) RAND Corporation Santa Monica California USA

2. Fielding School of Public Health University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Los Angeles California USA

3. School of Medicine University of California San Francisco (UCSF) San Francisco California USA

4. Economics, Sociology, and Statistics (ESS) RAND Corporation Arlington Virginia USA

5. Department of Medicine at Stanford Stanford University Palo Alto California USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveEvaluate whether cost‐sharing decreases led high‐deductible health plans (HDHP) enrollees to increase their use of healthcare.Data Sources, Study SettingNational sample of chronically‐ill patients age 18–64 from 2018 to 2020 (n = 1,318,178).Study DesignDifference‐in‐differences analyses using entropy‐balancing weights were used to evaluate the effect of a policy shift to $0 cost‐sharing for telehealth on utilization for HDHP compared with non‐HDHP enrollees. Due to this shock, HDHP enrollees experienced substantial declines in cost‐sharing for telehealth, while non‐HDHP enrollees experienced small declines. Event study models were also used to evaluate changes over time.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsOutcomes included use of any outpatient care; use of $0 telehealth; use of $0 telehealth as a proportion of all outpatient care; and use of any telehealth. To test whether any differences were due to preferences for care modality versus cost‐sharing, we further evaluated use of non‐$0 telehealth as a placebo test.Principal FindingsThere was no difference in change in overall outpatient visits (p = 0.84), with chronicall‐ill HDHP enrollees using less care both before and after the policy shift. However, compared with non‐HDHP enrollees, HDHP enrollees increased their use of $0 telehealth by 0.08 visits over a 9‐month period, a 27% increase (95% CI 0.07–0.09, p < 0.001) and shifted 1.2 percentage points more of their care to $0 telehealth, a 15% increase (ß = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01, 0.01, p < 0.001). However, HDHP enrollees had lower uptake of non‐$0 telehealth than non‐HDHP enrollees (ß = −0.01, 95%CI −0.02, 0.00, p = 0.04).ConclusionsRecent‐but‐expiring federal legislation exempts telehealth from HDHP deductibles for care provided in 2023 and 2024. Our results indicate that extending the protections provided by this legislation could help reduce the gap in access to care for chronically‐ill persons enrolled in HDHPs.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

Reference32 articles.

1. CohenRA MartinezM ZammittiEP.Health Insurance Coverage: Early Release of Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey. January–March 20182018https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/Insur201808.pdf

2. Medication utilization and adherence in a health savings account‐eligible plan;Fronstin P;Am J Manag Care,2013

3. What does a deductible do? The impact of cost‐sharing on health care prices, quantities, and spending dynamics;Brot‐Goldberg Z;Q J Econ,2015

4. Healthcare spending and preventive care in high‐deductible and consumer‐directed health plans;Beeuwkes Buntin M;Am J Manag Care,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3