Abstract
Abstract
Social scientists have recently explored how framing of gains and losses affects productivity. We conducted a field experiment in peri-urban Uganda, and compared output levels across 1,000 workers over isomorphic tasks and incentives, framed as either losses or gains. We find that loss aversion can be leveraged to increase the productivity of labour. The estimated welfare costs of using the loss contract are quite modest—perhaps because the loss contract is viewed as a (soft) commitment device.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference58 articles.
1. Reference points and effort provision;Abeler;American Economic Review,2011
2. The welfare effects of nudges: a case study of energy use social comparisons;Allcott;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2019
3. Working over time: dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks;Augenblick;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2015
4. Who is “behavioural”? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences;Benjamin;Journal of the European Economic Association,2013
5. ‘Self-control and commitment: can decreasing the liquidity of a savings account increase deposits?;Beshears,2015
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献