Affiliation:
1. UC Berkeley, Haas School of Business Stanford University and NBER Stanford University
Abstract
Abstract
Experimental tests of dynamically inconsistent time preferences have largely relied on choices over time-dated monetary rewards. Several recent studies have failed to find the standard patterns of present bias. However, such monetary studies contain often-discussed confounds. In this article, we sidestep these confounds and investigate choices over consumption (real effort) in a longitudinal experiment. We pair this effort study with a companion monetary discounting study. We confirm very limited time inconsistency in monetary choices. However, subjects show considerably more present bias in effort. Furthermore, present bias in the allocation of work has predictive power for demand of a meaningfully binding commitment device. Therefore our findings validate a key implication of models of dynamic inconsistency, with corresponding policy implications.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference42 articles.
1. “Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences,”;Andersen;Econometrica,2008
2. “Discounting Behavior: A Reconsideration,”;Andersen
3. “Estimating Time Preferences with Convex Budgets,”;Andreoni;American Economic Review,2012
4. “Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences,”;Andreoni;American Economic Review,2012
5. “Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment,”;Ariely;Psychological Science,2002
Cited by
314 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献