How Important Is Budding Speciation for Comparative Studies?

Author:

Caetano Daniel S12ORCID,Quental Tiago B2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University , 8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21252 , USA

2. Department of Ecology, University of São Paulo , Rua do Matão, 321 - Trav. 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090 , Brazil

Abstract

Abstract The acknowledgment of evolutionary dependence among species has fundamentally changed how we ask biological questions. Phylogenetic models became the standard approach for studies with 3 or more lineages, in particular those using extant species. Most phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) translate relatedness into covariance, meaning that evolutionary changes before lineages split should be interpreted together whereas after the split lineages are expected to change independently. This clever realization has shaped decades of research. Here, we discuss one element of the comparative method often ignored or assumed as unimportant: if nodes of a phylogeny represent the dissolution of the ancestral lineage into two new ones or if the ancestral lineage can survive speciation events (i.e., budding). Budding speciation is often reported in paleontological studies, due to the nature of the evidence for budding in the fossil record, but it is surprisingly absent in comparative methods. Here, we show that many PCMs assume that divergence happens as a symmetric split, even if these methods do not explicitly mention this assumption. We discuss the properties of trait evolution models for continuous and discrete traits and their adequacy under a scenario of budding speciation. We discuss the effects of budding speciation under a series of plausible evolutionary scenarios and show when and how these can influence our estimates. We also propose that long-lived lineages that have survived through a series of budding speciation events and given birth to multiple new lineages can produce evolutionary patterns that challenge our intuition about the most parsimonious history of trait changes in a clade. We hope our discussion can help bridge comparative approaches in paleontology and neontology as well as foster awareness about the assumptions we make when we use phylogenetic trees. [Budding speciation; diversification; fossil record; model adequacy; phylogenetic comparative methods; speciation mode.]

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference80 articles.

1. The geography and ecology of plant speciation: range overlap and niche divergence in sister species;Anacker;Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci,2014

2. A phylogeny of Cenozoic macroperforate planktonic foraminifera from fossil data;Aze;Biol. Rev,2011

3. Origin of the serpentine-endemic herb Layia discoidea from the widespread L. glandulosa (Compositae);Baldwin;Evolution,2005

4. When can clades be potentially resolved with morphology;Bapst;PLoS One,2013

5. Comparing cal3 and other a posteriori time-scaling approaches in a case study with the pterocephaliid trilobites;Bapst;Paleobiology,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3